From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECF6218DB26; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 14:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782398197; cv=none; b=HYdwEB7QfLqe/3DnbmAlvfi+wBPrnzCX2Z5MXEdgbAXWOoEvseHQy+OqzZqzGRz0oiPTviU91sI1rcUbhmkoKrYtYdvF4ioMKdLoQy7KzprNaVGJ3638pKRQXYADDYUeZR1YsDfwELOwgiNBsWQqvuWW4lXQtHFPNO5oYjFulB4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782398197; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MutUaWOcy8UStgksZpXCxUL5JTNVq1Aic408mCjLWjw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mAS2vIMTsfWVdnTXpnbY7kPBhgO303pGKVuvOOPaagp1UlNC46dFXSeUajflGcSAJyeMJqMgj5DdyF5S5AehAqxhA97/b9Es+Wdf+xWbR6LvH7ealv/CB7TsBNQFGVbqsal2C0rVUNLwHBhyjTeyzDsgVX/CnVoX0d3c7bG9qiM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nxJwCI6t; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nxJwCI6t" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91F061F00A3A; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 14:36:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782398196; bh=LbSQkfUUlzm5zlB1XH+iM2dbK0d5bmjr1Jd4ex8GGE4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=nxJwCI6tILxtZLWztXsGB2hXuTRqgwqMtlBNb9SwQfiFgTf4BwK7tkt4/60WcFxhq WgdakcxzOSbmO1pZlz48Hn8c6mLbmbf5jsn3qorIx7dUfoBQsYOSHkQ4t/WckAr//q /MM19xu9Tso+qpPYVDEJwvqTn9R6EWh2B2SN0kZI6RBNmVjrHwFijNIQqjXB0bMesj KC6QtGAldBYE8BAjVx8dDHvsGIOp9N24xCqqMFMMpJjrub7FYm/rASSmESrchXGikh ch3yr3LpxCjtqWw6o6vmJtdz92hDFUBO2Ffk98AleKRl1EIkzsHeAzHVRCUfm+HUda vS5o6WOB4poBg== Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 07:36:36 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Maciej Fijalkowski Cc: , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests/xsk: preserve UMEM view in bidi test Message-ID: <20260625073636.449a28c0@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260623091008.1046547-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> <20260624193326.295e3711@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 25 Jun 2026 12:35:12 +0200 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 07:33:26PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 11:10:08 +0200 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > > > Subject: [PATCH net-next] selftests/xsk: preserve UMEM view in bidi test > > > > Do you want it in net? Either way - we'll need a rebase > > I have not checked if this has been -net propagated already, but the rule > of thumb on bpf side was that all selftests related effort goes to -next. > Is it different on netdev side? We prefer -next too, but during the merge window net-next is closed. What we definitely don't want is a -next patch with a Fixes tag. So either net or drop the tag, please.