Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: justinlai0215@realtek.com
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
	richardcochran@gmail.com, david.laight.linux@gmail.com,
	aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, pkshih@realtek.com,
	larry.chiu@realtek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] rtase: Workaround for TX hang caused by short UDP packets entering hardware PTP parsing
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 19:01:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630020126.2366786-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626044539.37753-1-justinlai0215@realtek.com>

This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
    rtase: Workaround for TX hang caused by short UDP packets entering hardware PTP parsing

This commit attempts to work around a hardware TX hang caused by out-of-bounds
reads during PTP parsing. It introduces logic to pad short UDP packets to a
minimum transport data length before transmission.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> index 255667775f0e8..944ffe71b2d07 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
[ ... ]
> +static bool rtase_get_udp_offset(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *udp_offset)
> +{
> +	struct ipv6hdr *i6h, _i6h;
> +	struct iphdr *ih, _ih;
> +	__be16 proto;
> +	u32 no;
> +
> +	if (!rtase_get_l3_proto(skb, &proto, &no))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	switch (proto) {
> +	case htons(ETH_P_IP):
> +		ih = skb_header_pointer(skb, no, sizeof(_ih), &_ih);
> +		if (!ih)
> +			return false;

[Severity: High]
Does this skip the padding workaround if the IP header itself is truncated?

If the packet is shorter than the IP header (e.g., less than 34 bytes),
skb_header_pointer() will return false. This causes rtase_skb_pad() to
return true, allowing the packet to skip padding. Could this small unpadded
packet still trigger the hardware parser and cause the TX hang?

[ ... ]
> +static bool rtase_skb_pad(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	__be16 *dest, _dest;
> +	u32 trans_data_len;
> +	u32 udp_offset;
> +	u16 dest_port;
> +	u32 pad_len;
> +
> +	if (!rtase_get_udp_offset(skb, &udp_offset))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	if (udp_offset > skb->len)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	trans_data_len = skb->len - udp_offset;
> +	if (trans_data_len < offsetof(struct udphdr, len) ||
> +	    trans_data_len >= RTASE_MIN_PAD_LEN)
> +		return true;

[Severity: High]
Can an attacker bypass the workaround if the transport payload is very small?

By returning true when trans_data_len is less than
offsetof(struct udphdr, len) (which is 4 bytes), the packet is passed to
the hardware unpadded.

If an attacker sends an IPv4 non-initial fragment with a very small payload,
the hardware parser might identify the fragment as UDP and attempt to read the
destination port at offset 2 from the payload. If this out-of-bounds read
hits residual uninitialized memory in the TX FIFO containing PTP port values
(319 or 320), the hardware could incorrectly classify it as a PTP packet,
continue parsing out of bounds, and trigger the TX hang.

> +
> +	dest = skb_header_pointer(skb,
-- 
pw-bot: cr

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-30  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-26  4:45 [PATCH net v4] rtase: Workaround for TX hang caused by short UDP packets entering hardware PTP parsing Justin Lai
2026-06-30  2:01 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260630020126.2366786-1-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=justinlai0215@realtek.com \
    --cc=larry.chiu@realtek.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox