From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from CY7PR03CU001.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-westcentralusazon11010039.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.93.198.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCC3C3AE701; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 07:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=40.93.198.39 ARC-Seal:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782891329; cv=fail; b=QMhTQOt+9BBn1kI2z7auPGJFVc1UHqMUqyFYybzT8+IGLYMBV5yzSLj6N5/4RIVccr6IXrp1kCifOi+487gJ/1/Dd/z9Iwiw500MplosOatv5DmZuasgPTIi+crL2gDWKEVdfWpEFY1ZSHlej5v2RNPGD1d+jU/s7iuOnUF4CH4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782891329; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dD/H6SaiAKtuCCrLqCIU3gdH8S/TlkokSPN6w/6hJ+o=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MQWUtAn3XlR7f9Fkcxb8NBajQARmQ5yx+XRJtS9Vrv6kHdnlPc2DQ7Npea2KBPemUl51O4+VKFmz5NE/m8eyLEF0CbiTb5ay2rULYCJ+8U03+WFUWAZAptLW56bws4zOOpFRZE3F7AB2rlyzUM5vqMrSovs0zUXvZo4JbXqVLxo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=Nvidia.com header.i=@Nvidia.com header.b=lxs9vzN0; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=40.93.198.39 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=Nvidia.com header.i=@Nvidia.com header.b="lxs9vzN0" ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=De0aexhDGnYK5AiwC1TmmlG+sXSK9/DzLRQR1MWmhel9WCms8BoxMl7USujvuF4pqXBxE+3WKFA9J5l0cqTUFmf/3DSat0taA0fBLRjwbTTjycHQyBUjS8G5eeE10y5eX7/dz3J2jI5sK4csWJNC+7PJw+0EtWghuUTD22DzLyqPWluJE1HDY5UzAqxQayd0tgB6VPcgzt1tPVdlALY0hopn2ST+OA0T7PlZVrjiPSQHQB8dhsZd/FZHxPLe5E4ldcz8hLC7SLKb3zrghBz7ZKvd1yYYLvEMr50q1ocGM58M+wzTxZfy6p2LYdoOWpKHPkj0dN0PbPAW0YqWhKWviA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=A81cpU63WD/ncPW3tdY4/+F8Sb32G/Ul2zH6i8azMqM=; b=S+wLx9+C7II4XdQYzivjY+PbzU2BZYTR3JN/PjZAE8XrNT6p2VGjc0adh769BU4FVQaxRoviPCKfjdOlVA8MXy8hzM16eFtcDqFvOaVLYdtQLj4OY6/rWu5AVNNJEZZaTrdp7efIwCJLxhGI10R7URcOa0ik7bYyCfM2pL+Y0fFeQiRQL7RpVk09r8dkq9SLdn3T72wcxpLxWGZs5Jhe1y3EeNhYUaGSvb9Yxmkb1QT22knxjLyeG0EmnhUSRqRNwu0b8ikFk49hQR0QrJ7muquv8qhgsCv4mBQUBGE60ueTEXRVr3X9HNBI9feJJHgkJHLCU15BPhUT3JCoiAW3Nw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 216.228.117.161) smtp.rcpttodomain=lunn.ch smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass (p=reject sp=reject pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=A81cpU63WD/ncPW3tdY4/+F8Sb32G/Ul2zH6i8azMqM=; b=lxs9vzN0o2kgZHKtqFU4rDQhCZAIs7iqDlQgCU9hzIBicjg6GKHnVPJNT5tMapbfLlQtVgjKoY2OIcDPhVmjgNVVEMoPYYLSyxccD3/UfQE7tMAXuun29HKdjUdlaTA2knL/qKzxPIDf7OFlONPNs/CVylKDyVyaYXYcRcTHHhvdExQFwJPe+rt5kmrVaoLkvKEZM/h6MDLByVjnAmRT5hqupcAzr7suRVGa2xS7Kh9AzyfzbmmToI/gAnyveNncR/hTvjFE7HWODtGxEKtwQLRytlYNRnfxQW2lNVm2kIyVYMnTqNivPlskvYnN/6PyL8rNo9Tc+K15c/sQQJyVaw== Received: from SJ0PR03CA0173.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:338::28) by SJ1PR12MB6339.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:454::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.21.181.8; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 07:35:20 +0000 Received: from SJ1PEPF000023DA.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:338:cafe::99) by SJ0PR03CA0173.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:a03:338::28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.21.181.8 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 07:35:20 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 216.228.117.161) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates 216.228.117.161 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=216.228.117.161; helo=mail.nvidia.com; pr=C Received: from mail.nvidia.com (216.228.117.161) by SJ1PEPF000023DA.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.244.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.21.202.0 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 07:35:17 +0000 Received: from rnnvmail202.nvidia.com (10.129.68.7) by mail.nvidia.com (10.129.200.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.20; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 00:34:35 -0700 Received: from rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) by rnnvmail202.nvidia.com (10.129.68.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.20; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 00:34:34 -0700 Received: from vdi.nvidia.com (10.127.8.10) by mail.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.2.2562.20 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 00:34:25 -0700 From: Tariq Toukan To: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , , Paolo Abeni CC: Adithya Jayachandran , Bobby Eshleman , Carolina Jubran , Cosmin Ratiu , Daniel Borkmann , Daniel Jurgens , Daniel Zahka , David Wei , Donald Hunter , Dragos Tatulea , Jiri Pirko , Jiri Pirko , Joe Damato , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Leon Romanovsky , , , , , Mark Bloch , Moshe Shemesh , Or Har-Toov , Parav Pandit , Petr Machata , Ratheesh Kannoth , Saeed Mahameed , Shahar Shitrit , Shay Drori , Shuah Khan , Shuah Khan , Simon Horman , Stanislav Fomichev , Tariq Toukan , Willem de Bruijn , Gal Pressman Subject: [PATCH net-next V10 07/14] devlink: Allow rate node parents from other devlinks Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 10:32:47 +0300 Message-ID: <20260701073254.754518-8-tariqt@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.44.0 In-Reply-To: <20260701073254.754518-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> References: <20260701073254.754518-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-NV-OnPremToCloud: ExternallySecured X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: SJ1PEPF000023DA:EE_|SJ1PR12MB6339:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: cfcede0e-31e9-43f3-aeaf-08ded7434de4 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;ARA:13230040|23010399003|82310400026|7416014|376014|1800799024|36860700016|18002099003|22082099003|11063799006|3023799007|56012099006; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:216.228.117.161;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:mail.nvidia.com;PTR:dc6edge2.nvidia.com;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230040)(23010399003)(82310400026)(7416014)(376014)(1800799024)(36860700016)(18002099003)(22082099003)(11063799006)(3023799007)(56012099006);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: 4FZB6LCIL59F5uJrT/cTU+vfBtZyTaglvIOj9HFSnYbg0SKc7ulQipPX6iy5WQJAN7ymKFnudp2ahVwUl2ZP1pOcI7CThtb7hHZBsPaUr3FykkuSktu5IMVUbjtCxA8ryOoJSI0w73WLRcJ7xN7N658+5n9oRe5Y5EEVb41DvOzHbqhrabtpwAVMvZCv0eP7e0s1NNcI9tkHdCcT9Jl8/vz5LC66xkqMTGyyspy3sLiwWEGfQVYu6xjXIpOe1IGMCCEMV8rL7am8HWuPOHv82YYCmaFdlODE9pV4V6lLuZD8rdriJBtx/seyR9s0otx8bf1iAge06UdjWRMSheNGCYntCFP8K1I5SBIiK9DZoq9ga2N+eGfVDa4TMMVSaoVWY5t2ULz12jUlX0WOyBjFRZYzas0bKUbR8Vj8LvIexQ9I1leIBH7C3KLKCqiaVR5R X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jul 2026 07:35:17.1383 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cfcede0e-31e9-43f3-aeaf-08ded7434de4 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[216.228.117.161];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SJ1PEPF000023DA.namprd21.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SJ1PR12MB6339 From: Cosmin Ratiu This commit makes use of the building blocks previously added to implement cross-device rate nodes. A new 'supported_cross_device_rate_nodes' bool is added to devlink_ops which lets drivers advertise support for cross-device rate objects. If enabled and if there is a common shared devlink instance, then: - all rate objects will be stored in the top-most common nested instance and - rate objects can have parents from other devices sharing the same common instance. Storing rates in the common shared ancestor is safe, because it is reference counted by its nested devlink instances, so it's guaranteed to outlive them. Furthermore, the shared devlink infra guarantees a given nested devlink hierarchy is managed by the same driver. The parent devlink from info->ctx is not locked, so none of its mutable fields can be used. But parent setting only requires comparing devlink pointer comparisons. Additionally, since the shared devlink is locked, other rate operations cannot concurrently happen. Signed-off-by: Cosmin Ratiu Reviewed-by: Carolina Jubran Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan --- .../networking/devlink/devlink-port.rst | 2 + include/net/devlink.h | 9 ++ net/devlink/core.c | 4 +- net/devlink/rate.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++-- 4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-port.rst b/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-port.rst index 9374ebe70f48..18aca77006d5 100644 --- a/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-port.rst +++ b/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-port.rst @@ -420,6 +420,8 @@ API allows to configure following rate object's parameters: Parent node name. Parent node rate limits are considered as additional limits to all node children limits. ``tx_max`` is an upper limit for children. ``tx_share`` is a total bandwidth distributed among children. + If the device supports cross-function scheduling, the parent can be from a + different function of the same underlying device. ``tc_bw`` Allow users to set the bandwidth allocation per traffic class on rate diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h index dd546dbd57cf..ffe1ad5fb70b 100644 --- a/include/net/devlink.h +++ b/include/net/devlink.h @@ -1594,6 +1594,15 @@ struct devlink_ops { struct devlink_rate *parent, void *priv_child, void *priv_parent, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack); + /* Indicates if cross-device rate nodes are supported. + * This also requires a shared common ancestor object all devices that + * could share rate nodes are nested in. + * If enabled, rate operations may be called on an instance with only + * the common ancestor lock held and *without that instance lock held*. + * It is the driver's responsibility to ensure proper serialization + * with other operations. + */ + bool supported_cross_device_rate_nodes; /** * selftests_check() - queries if selftest is supported * @devlink: devlink instance diff --git a/net/devlink/core.c b/net/devlink/core.c index ee26c50b4118..c53a42e17a58 100644 --- a/net/devlink/core.c +++ b/net/devlink/core.c @@ -534,6 +534,9 @@ void devlink_free(struct devlink *devlink) { ASSERT_DEVLINK_NOT_REGISTERED(devlink); + devl_lock(devlink); + WARN_ON(devlink_rates_check(devlink, NULL, NULL)); + devl_unlock(devlink); devlink_rel_put(devlink); WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->trap_policer_list)); @@ -544,7 +547,6 @@ void devlink_free(struct devlink *devlink) WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->resource_list)); WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->dpipe_table_list)); WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->sb_list)); - WARN_ON(devlink_rates_check(devlink, NULL, NULL)); WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->linecard_list)); WARN_ON(!xa_empty(&devlink->ports)); diff --git a/net/devlink/rate.c b/net/devlink/rate.c index 78a59d79c2ea..e727c8b8b33e 100644 --- a/net/devlink/rate.c +++ b/net/devlink/rate.c @@ -30,14 +30,42 @@ devlink_rate_leaf_get_from_info(struct devlink *devlink, struct genl_info *info) return devlink_rate ?: ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); } +/* Repeatedly walks the nested devlink chain while cross device rate nodes are + * supported and finds the topmost instance where rates should be stored. + * That instance is locked, referenced and returned. + * When cross device rate nodes aren't supported the original devlink instance + * is returned. + */ static struct devlink *devl_rate_lock(struct devlink *devlink) { - return devlink; + struct devlink *rate_devlink = devlink, *parent; + + devl_assert_locked(devlink); + + while (rate_devlink->ops && + rate_devlink->ops->supported_cross_device_rate_nodes) { + parent = devlink_nested_in_get_lock(rate_devlink); + if (!parent) + break; + if (rate_devlink != devlink) { + /* Unlock intermediate instances. */ + devl_unlock(rate_devlink); + devlink_put(rate_devlink); + } + rate_devlink = parent; + } + return rate_devlink; } +/* Unlocks and puts 'rate devlink' if different than 'devlink'. */ static void devl_rate_unlock(struct devlink *devlink, struct devlink *rate_devlink) { + if (devlink == rate_devlink) + return; + + devl_unlock(rate_devlink); + devlink_put(rate_devlink); } static struct devlink_rate * @@ -121,6 +149,25 @@ static int devlink_rate_put_tc_bws(struct sk_buff *msg, u32 *tc_bw) return -EMSGSIZE; } +static int devlink_nl_rate_parent_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, + struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate) +{ + struct devlink_rate *parent = devlink_rate->parent; + struct devlink *devlink = parent->devlink; + + if (nla_put_string(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_PARENT_NODE_NAME, + parent->name)) + return -EMSGSIZE; + + if (devlink != devlink_rate->devlink && + devlink_nl_put_nested_handle(msg, + devlink_net(devlink_rate->devlink), + devlink, DEVLINK_ATTR_PARENT_DEV)) + return -EMSGSIZE; + + return 0; +} + static int devlink_nl_rate_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate, enum devlink_command cmd, u32 portid, u32 seq, @@ -165,10 +212,9 @@ static int devlink_nl_rate_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, devlink_rate->tx_weight)) goto nla_put_failure; - if (devlink_rate->parent) - if (nla_put_string(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_PARENT_NODE_NAME, - devlink_rate->parent->name)) - goto nla_put_failure; + if (devlink_rate->parent && + devlink_nl_rate_parent_fill(msg, devlink_rate)) + goto nla_put_failure; if (devlink_rate_put_tc_bws(msg, devlink_rate->tc_bw)) goto nla_put_failure; @@ -322,13 +368,14 @@ devlink_nl_rate_parent_node_set(struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate, struct genl_info *info, struct nlattr *nla_parent) { - struct devlink *devlink = devlink_rate->devlink; + struct devlink *devlink = devlink_rate->devlink, *parent_devlink; const char *parent_name = nla_data(nla_parent); const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops; size_t len = strlen(parent_name); struct devlink_rate *parent; int err = -EOPNOTSUPP; + parent_devlink = devlink_nl_ctx(info)->parent_devlink ? : devlink; parent = devlink_rate->parent; if (parent && !len) { @@ -346,7 +393,13 @@ devlink_nl_rate_parent_node_set(struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate, refcount_dec(&parent->refcnt); devlink_rate->parent = NULL; } else if (len) { - parent = devlink_rate_node_get_by_name(rate_devlink, devlink, + /* parent_devlink (when different than devlink) isn't locked, + * but the rate node devlink instance is, so nobody from the + * same group of devices sharing rates could change the used + * fields or unregister the parent. + */ + parent = devlink_rate_node_get_by_name(rate_devlink, + parent_devlink, parent_name); if (IS_ERR(parent)) return -ENODEV; @@ -633,9 +686,11 @@ static bool devlink_rate_set_ops_supported(const struct devlink_ops *ops, int devlink_nl_rate_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) { - struct devlink *rate_devlink, *devlink = devlink_nl_ctx(info)->devlink; + struct devlink_nl_ctx *ctx = devlink_nl_ctx(info); + struct devlink *devlink = ctx->devlink; struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate; const struct devlink_ops *ops; + struct devlink *rate_devlink; int err; rate_devlink = devl_rate_lock(devlink); @@ -652,6 +707,14 @@ int devlink_nl_rate_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) goto unlock; } + if (ctx->parent_devlink && ctx->parent_devlink != devlink && + !ops->supported_cross_device_rate_nodes) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(info->extack, + "Cross-device rate parents aren't supported"); + err = -EOPNOTSUPP; + goto unlock; + } + err = devlink_nl_rate_set(devlink_rate, rate_devlink, ops, info); if (!err) @@ -679,6 +742,13 @@ int devlink_nl_rate_new_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) if (!devlink_rate_set_ops_supported(ops, info, DEVLINK_RATE_TYPE_NODE)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; + if (ctx->parent_devlink && ctx->parent_devlink != devlink && + !ops->supported_cross_device_rate_nodes) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(info->extack, + "Cross-device rate parents aren't supported"); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + rate_devlink = devl_rate_lock(devlink); rate_node = devlink_rate_node_get_from_attrs(rate_devlink, devlink, info->attrs); -- 2.44.0