From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Brett Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
Cc: Simon Schippers <simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>,
regressions@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Tim Gebauer <tim.gebauer@tu-dortmund.de>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][BISECTED] tun/tap & vhost-net: multi-threaded network performance
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 18:44:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260702183435-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <akZGg96-Xu9VeGrw@karahi.librecast.net>
On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 01:07:47PM +0200, Brett Sheffield wrote:
> On 2026-07-02 09:24, Simon Schippers wrote:
> > On 7/1/26 22:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 09:16:48PM +0200, Brett Sheffield wrote:
> > >> TL;DR - Commit 1d6e569b7d0c0b2736636749e4be0a27f3cefcb3 causes
> > >> significant performance regressions with TAP interfaces and multithreaded
> > >> network code. Please revert.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Librecast is an IPv6 multicast library. One of the tests (0055) fails under
> > >> Linux 7.2-rc1. The test performs data synchronization over IPv6 multicast using a TAP
> > >> interface. This test has run successfully on every stable, LTS and mainline RC
> > >> released in the past year. Every kernel with my Tested-by has run this test.
> > >>
> > >> There have been a bunch of changes to MLDv2 so I started bisecting there, but
> > >> the culprit is actually 1d6e569b7d0c0b2736636749e4be0a27f3cefcb3 "tun/tap &
> > >> vhost-net: avoid ptr_ring tail-drop when a qdisc is present"
> > >>
> > >> Reverting this commit fixes the test.
> > >>
> > >> To eliminate my code and any multicast weirdness, I ran tests with iperf3
> > >> comparing the same host running 7.2-rc1 both with and without 1d6e569b7d0
> > >> reverted.
> >
> > Thank you very much for your bisect!
> >
> > As the author, I am sorry for that regression!
>
> No worries. That's why we test :-)
>
> > > - does it help to increase the tun queue size?
> >
> > I agree, this would be great to know.
> >
> > However, even then we must act. I am considering IFF_BACKPRESSURE
> > as a feature flag, defaulting to off. It would just enable/disable
> > the stopping logic in tun_net_xmit() and the waking logic
> > in __tun_wake_queue(). If disabled, it would result in the same logic
> > as before.
> >
> > I could provide such a patch as [net] material.
>
> I'm going to make myself a strong cup of tea and dig into it a bit more here and
> will let you know if I find anything worth reporting.
>
> If you need me to try re-testing with specific settings or test a patch I'm
> happy to do so.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Brett
> --
> Brett Sheffield (he/him)
> Librecast - Decentralising the Internet with Multicast
> https://librecast.net/
> https://blog.brettsheffield.com/
Well, the issue was with host to guest right?
Then testing what does bql do might be interesting.
Might help.
Something like this? Lightly tested.
diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index bfa49fa9e3a1..abc46354c107 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -1076,6 +1076,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
queue = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, txq);
spin_lock(&tfile->tx_ring.producer_lock);
+ netdev_tx_sent_queue(queue, len);
ret = __ptr_ring_produce(&tfile->tx_ring, skb);
if (!qdisc_txq_has_no_queue(queue) &&
__ptr_ring_check_produce(&tfile->tx_ring) == -ENOSPC) {
@@ -1088,6 +1089,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
spin_unlock(&tfile->tx_ring.producer_lock);
if (ret) {
+ netdev_tx_completed_queue(queue, 1, len);
/* This should be a rare case if a qdisc is present, but
* can happen due to lltx.
* Since skb_tx_timestamp(), skb_orphan(),
@@ -2148,15 +2150,19 @@ static ssize_t tun_put_user(struct tun_struct *tun,
/* Callers must hold ring.consumer_lock */
static void __tun_wake_queue(struct tun_struct *tun,
- struct tun_file *tfile, int consumed)
+ struct tun_file *tfile,
+ unsigned int pkts, unsigned int bytes)
{
struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(tun->dev,
tfile->queue_index);
+ if (bytes)
+ netdev_tx_completed_queue(txq, pkts, bytes);
+
/* Paired with smp_mb__after_atomic() in tun_net_xmit() */
smp_mb();
if (netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq)) {
- tfile->cons_cnt += consumed;
+ tfile->cons_cnt += pkts;
if (tfile->cons_cnt >= tfile->tx_ring.size / 2 ||
__ptr_ring_empty(&tfile->tx_ring)) {
netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
@@ -2167,12 +2173,16 @@ static void __tun_wake_queue(struct tun_struct *tun,
static void *tun_ring_consume(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile)
{
+ unsigned int bytes = 0;
void *ptr;
spin_lock(&tfile->tx_ring.consumer_lock);
ptr = __ptr_ring_consume(&tfile->tx_ring);
- if (ptr)
- __tun_wake_queue(tun, tfile, 1);
+ if (ptr) {
+ if (!tun_is_xdp_frame(ptr))
+ bytes = ((struct sk_buff *)ptr)->len;
+ __tun_wake_queue(tun, tfile, 1, bytes);
+ }
spin_unlock(&tfile->tx_ring.consumer_lock);
return ptr;
@@ -3805,7 +3815,7 @@ struct ptr_ring *tun_get_tx_ring(struct file *file)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tun_get_tx_ring);
/* Callers must hold ring.consumer_lock */
-void tun_wake_queue(struct file *file, int consumed)
+void tun_wake_queue(struct file *file, unsigned int pkts, unsigned int bytes)
{
struct tun_file *tfile;
struct tun_struct *tun;
@@ -3821,7 +3831,7 @@ void tun_wake_queue(struct file *file, int consumed)
tun = rcu_dereference(tfile->tun);
if (tun)
- __tun_wake_queue(tun, tfile, consumed);
+ __tun_wake_queue(tun, tfile, pkts, bytes);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index db341c922673..5267b323bd59 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -181,14 +181,23 @@ static int vhost_net_buf_produce(struct sock *sk,
{
struct file *file = sk->sk_socket->file;
struct vhost_net_buf *rxq = &nvq->rxq;
+ unsigned int bytes = 0;
+ int i;
rxq->head = 0;
spin_lock(&nvq->rx_ring->consumer_lock);
rxq->tail = __ptr_ring_consume_batched(nvq->rx_ring, rxq->queue,
VHOST_NET_BATCH);
- if (rxq->tail)
- tun_wake_queue(file, rxq->tail);
+ if (rxq->tail) {
+ for (i = 0; i < rxq->tail; i++) {
+ void *ptr = rxq->queue[i];
+
+ if (!tun_is_xdp_frame(ptr))
+ bytes += ((struct sk_buff *)ptr)->len;
+ }
+ tun_wake_queue(file, rxq->tail, bytes);
+ }
spin_unlock(&nvq->rx_ring->consumer_lock);
return rxq->tail;
diff --git a/include/linux/if_tun.h b/include/linux/if_tun.h
index 5f3e206c7a73..49b85bf4f828 100644
--- a/include/linux/if_tun.h
+++ b/include/linux/if_tun.h
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ struct tun_msg_ctl {
#if defined(CONFIG_TUN) || defined(CONFIG_TUN_MODULE)
struct socket *tun_get_socket(struct file *);
struct ptr_ring *tun_get_tx_ring(struct file *file);
-void tun_wake_queue(struct file *file, int consumed);
+void tun_wake_queue(struct file *file, unsigned int pkts, unsigned int bytes);
static inline bool tun_is_xdp_frame(void *ptr)
{
@@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ static inline struct ptr_ring *tun_get_tx_ring(struct file *f)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
-static inline void tun_wake_queue(struct file *f, int consumed) {}
+static inline void tun_wake_queue(struct file *f,
+ unsigned int pkts, unsigned int bytes) {}
static inline bool tun_is_xdp_frame(void *ptr)
{
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 19:16 [REGRESSION][BISECTED] tun/tap & vhost-net: multi-threaded network performance Brett Sheffield
2026-07-01 20:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-02 7:24 ` Simon Schippers
2026-07-02 7:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-02 8:01 ` Simon Schippers
2026-07-02 11:07 ` Brett Sheffield
2026-07-02 22:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2026-07-03 10:34 ` Simon Schippers
2026-07-02 22:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-03 10:35 ` Simon Schippers
2026-07-03 10:41 ` Simon Schippers
2026-07-03 11:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260702183435-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bacs@librecast.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de \
--cc=tim.gebauer@tu-dortmund.de \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox