From: Zhixing Chen <running910@gmail.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Zhixing Chen <running910@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] gtp: parse extension headers before reading inner protocol
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 16:42:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260703084244.59077-1-running910@gmail.com> (raw)
GTPv1-U packets may carry a chain of extension headers before the inner
IP packet. The receive path already parses and skips these extension
headers, but it currently reads the inner protocol before doing so.
As a result, the first extension header byte is interpreted as the inner
IP version. Packets with extension headers are then dropped before PDP
lookup.
Parse the extension header chain before calling gtp_inner_proto(), so the
inner protocol is read from the actual inner IP header.
Signed-off-by: Zhixing Chen <running910@gmail.com>
---
I noticed this while running a few GTP tunnel tests with a veth pair and a
peer network namespace.
The commands below only set up a small GTPv1-U demo and verify that the
plain tunnel works as expected:
ip link add vroot type veth peer name vpeer
ip a a 172.0.0.1/24 dev vroot
ip link set vroot up
ip a a 172.99.0.1/32 dev lo
gtp-link add gtp0 ip 172.0.0.1 &
gtp-tunnel add gtp0 v1 200 100 172.99.0.2 172.0.0.2
ip r a 172.99.0.2/32 dev gtp0
ip link set gtp0 mtu 1500
ip netns add nspeer
ip link set vpeer netns nspeer
ip netns exec nspeer ip a a 172.0.0.2/24 dev vpeer
ip netns exec nspeer ip link set vpeer up
ip netns exec nspeer ip a a 172.99.0.2/32 dev lo
ip netns exec nspeer ip link set lo up
ip netns exec nspeer gtp-link add gtp1 ip 172.0.0.2 &
ip netns exec nspeer gtp-tunnel add gtp1 v1 100 200 172.99.0.1 172.0.0.1
ip netns exec nspeer ip r a 172.99.0.1/32 dev gtp1
ip netns exec nspeer ip link set gtp1 mtu 1500
With this setup, plain traffic between 172.99.0.1 and 172.99.0.2 goes
through the GTP tunnel.
After that, I used a small sender in the peer namespace to build two
UDP/2152 packets for the root namespace GTP endpoint. Both packets use TEID
200 and carry an inner UDP packet from 172.99.0.2:12345 to
172.99.0.1:9999. The first packet is a plain GTPv1-U T-PDU. The second
packet carries the same inner UDP packet after a GTP extension header.
Before this fix, a receiver bound to 172.99.0.1:9999 only receives the
plain packet:
root@vm:/# python gtp_nsroot_recv.py
listening on 172.99.0.1:9999
received #1 from ('172.99.0.2', 12345): b'plain'
After this fix, it receives both packets:
root@vm:/# python gtp_nsroot_recv.py
listening on 172.99.0.1:9999
received #1 from ('172.99.0.2', 12345): b'plain'
received #2 from ('172.99.0.2', 12345): b'extension'
---
drivers/net/gtp.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/gtp.c b/drivers/net/gtp.c
index a60ef32b35b8..4a8b00548673 100644
--- a/drivers/net/gtp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/gtp.c
@@ -826,6 +826,10 @@ static int gtp1u_udp_encap_recv(struct gtp_dev *gtp, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, hdrlen))
return -1;
+ if (gtp1->flags & GTP1_F_EXTHDR &&
+ gtp_parse_exthdrs(skb, &hdrlen) < 0)
+ return -1;
+
if (gtp_inner_proto(skb, hdrlen, &inner_proto) < 0) {
netdev_dbg(gtp->dev, "GTP packet does not encapsulate an IP packet\n");
return -1;
@@ -840,10 +844,6 @@ static int gtp1u_udp_encap_recv(struct gtp_dev *gtp, struct sk_buff *skb)
return 1;
}
- if (gtp1->flags & GTP1_F_EXTHDR &&
- gtp_parse_exthdrs(skb, &hdrlen) < 0)
- return -1;
-
return gtp_rx(pctx, skb, hdrlen, gtp->role, inner_proto);
}
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 8:42 Zhixing Chen [this message]
2026-07-03 8:54 ` [PATCH net] gtp: parse extension headers before reading inner protocol Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-07-03 9:49 ` Zhixing Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260703084244.59077-1-running910@gmail.com \
--to=running910@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox