From: Vimal Agrawal <avimalin@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, kuniyu@google.com, edumazet@google.com,
vimal.agrawal@sophos.com, avimalin@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: neigh: avoid calling neigh_forced_gc on every alloc when table is full
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 06:58:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706065813.66116-1-vimal.agrawal@sophos.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260625084213.4e0b70c4@kernel.org>
Once the neighbour table exceeds gc_thresh3, neigh_forced_gc() is called
on every allocation attempt with no rate limiting. In workloads with mostly
active/reachable entries, the GC walk traverses a large portion of the
neighbour table without reclaiming entries, holding tbl->lock for an
extended period. This causes severe lock contention and allocation
latencies exceeding 16ms under sustained neighbour creation.
Add a pre-lock check in neigh_forced_gc() to skip the GC run if one was
performed within the last 50 ms, avoiding repeated full table scans and
lock acquisitions on the hot allocation path.
Profiling of neigh_create() shows ~3 orders of magnitude latency
improvement with this change.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CALkUMdSCpx_ywYCx_ePLdm6yioO1nQWx7sSM=AEgsq0kywHxTw@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Vimal Agrawal <vimal.agrawal@sophos.com>
---
v2: Changed threshold from 1s (HZ) to 50ms (msecs_to_jiffies(50))
based on profiling data showing 44% -> 2.56% CPU reduction
net/core/neighbour.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
index 1349c0eedb64..a83535d32da3 100644
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -260,6 +260,9 @@ static int neigh_forced_gc(struct neigh_table *tbl)
int shrunk = 0;
int loop = 0;
+ if (!time_after(jiffies, READ_ONCE(tbl->last_flush) + msecs_to_jiffies(50)))
+ return 0;
+
NEIGH_CACHE_STAT_INC(tbl, forced_gc_runs);
spin_lock_bh(&tbl->lock);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-18 8:17 neigh: poor scalability of forced GC when neighbour count exceeds gc_thresh3 Vimal Agrawal
2026-06-25 10:20 ` [PATCH net-next] net: neigh: avoid calling neigh_forced_gc on every alloc when table is full Vimal Agrawal
2026-06-25 15:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-06 6:58 ` Vimal Agrawal [this message]
2026-07-06 14:19 ` [PATCH v2 " Paolo Abeni
2026-06-25 21:45 ` [PATCH " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-06-29 7:57 ` Vimal Agrawal
2026-06-29 18:05 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-06-30 12:01 ` Vimal Agrawal
2026-06-30 16:36 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-01 8:30 ` Vimal Agrawal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706065813.66116-1-vimal.agrawal@sophos.com \
--to=avimalin@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vimal.agrawal@sophos.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox