Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, David S Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>,
	D Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
	Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>,
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@linux.ibm.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] net: Use synchronous wakeups selectively
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 07:09:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260714013940.4068189-4-srikar@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

The scheduler assumes in several wakeup paths that a task using WF_SYNC
is likely to yield the CPU shortly. However several networking wakeup
paths unconditionally use synchronous wakeups even when the waking task
continues execution.

During wakeup, with WF_SYNC flag set, because of the assumption that
current thread is ready to give up, the wakee thread will be migrated
from any core within the chip to the current LLC. If these operations
are frequent, and wakers are actually not going away, then it will lead
to load imbalance and hurt performance. This is especially true in
architectures where LLCs are small and number of LLCs per chip are more.

Running vllm workload was run on Power10 system
                                  No patch      with patch %diff
Inference Time (sec)              17.84         16.35     -8.35%
llm query bandwidth (tokens/sec)  14.78         16.21     +9.68%

Lower inference time and higher tokens/sec is better.

Srikar Dronamraju (2):
  net/socket: Record preference for synchronous wakeups
  net/sock: Propagate WF_SYNC only when requested

 include/net/sock.h |  1 +
 net/core/sock.c    | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------
 net/sctp/socket.c  | 10 +++++++--
 net/smc/af_smc.c   |  4 ++--
 net/smc/smc_rx.c   | 10 +++++++--
 net/socket.c       | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 net/tipc/socket.c  | 22 +++++++++++++-----
 net/unix/af_unix.c | 26 ++++++++++++++-------
 8 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

-- 
2.51.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-07-14  1:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-14  1:39 Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2026-07-14  1:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] net/socket: Record preference for synchronous wakeups Srikar Dronamraju
2026-07-14  1:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] net/sock: Propagate WF_SYNC only when requested Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260714013940.4068189-4-srikar@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox