From: Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Tung Quang Nguyen <tung.quang.nguyen@est.tech>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v3] tipc: clear sock->sk on the failed-insert path in tipc_sk_create()
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 22:19:39 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260714131939.1255974-1-4ncienth@gmail.com> (raw)
When tipc_sk_create() fails to insert the new socket (tipc_sk_insert()
returns non-zero), its error path frees the sk with sk_free() but leaves
sock->sk pointing at the freed object:
if (tipc_sk_insert(tsk)) {
sk_free(sk);
pr_warn("Socket create failed; port number exhausted\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
This is harmless for plain socket(): the syscall layer clears sock->ops
before releasing, so tipc_release() is never called. It is not harmless
on the accept() path. tipc_accept() creates the pre-allocated child
socket with tipc_sk_create(net, new_sock, 0, kern); on failure it leaves
new_sock->sk dangling and new_sock->ops non-NULL, and do_accept() then
fput()s the new file, so __sock_release() -> tipc_release() runs
lock_sock(new_sock->sk) on the freed sk -- a use-after-free write of the
sk_lock spinlock.
tipc_release() already guards this exact "failed accept() releases a
pre-allocated child" case with "if (sk == NULL) return 0;", but the
guard is bypassed because tipc_sk_create() left sock->sk non-NULL
(dangling) rather than NULL.
Clear sock->sk on the failed-insert path so the existing tipc_release()
NULL check fires and the use-after-free is avoided.
The tipc_sk_insert() failure is reached when the per-netns socket
rhashtable hits its max_size (tsk_rht_params.max_size = 1048576, ~2M
elements) -- i.e. once a netns holds ~2M TIPC sockets every insert
returns -E2BIG.
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in lock_sock_nested (net/core/sock.c:3839)
Write of size 8 at addr ffff8880047cdc38 by task init/1
lock_sock_nested (net/core/sock.c:3839)
tipc_release (net/tipc/socket.c:638)
__sock_release (net/socket.c:710)
sock_close (net/socket.c:1501)
__fput (fs/file_table.c:512)
Allocated by task 1:
sk_alloc (net/core/sock.c:2308)
tipc_sk_create (net/tipc/socket.c:487)
tipc_accept (net/tipc/socket.c:2744)
do_accept (net/socket.c:2034)
Freed by task 1:
__sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2391)
tipc_sk_create (net/tipc/socket.c:504)
tipc_accept (net/tipc/socket.c:2744)
do_accept (net/socket.c:2034)
Fixes: 00aff3590fc0 ("net: tipc: fix possible refcount leak in tipc_sk_create()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Tung Nguyen <tung.quang.nguyen@est.tech>
Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com>
---
v3: correct the Fixes: tag to 00aff3590fc0 ("net: tipc: fix possible
refcount leak in tipc_sk_create()") -- that commit added the sk_free()
on the insert-failure path; before it the path leaked sk rather than
freeing it, so the use-after-free only exists since then (v5.19+).
Thanks Breno. Collect Reviewed-by from Tung and Breno. No code change.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260713082342.3803379-1-4ncienth@gmail.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260710014440.2055584-1-4ncienth@gmail.com/
net/tipc/socket.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/tipc/socket.c b/net/tipc/socket.c
index e564341e0216..55e695748332 100644
--- a/net/tipc/socket.c
+++ b/net/tipc/socket.c
@@ -502,6 +502,7 @@ static int tipc_sk_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
tipc_set_sk_state(sk, TIPC_OPEN);
if (tipc_sk_insert(tsk)) {
sk_free(sk);
+ sock->sk = NULL;
pr_warn("Socket create failed; port number exhausted\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.54.0
reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260714131939.1255974-1-4ncienth@gmail.com \
--to=4ncienth@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tung.quang.nguyen@est.tech \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox