From: Doruk Tan Ozturk <doruk@0sec.ai>
To: david.laight.linux@gmail.com
Cc: david@ixit.cz, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, horms@kernel.org,
oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] nfc: llcp: reject PDUs shorter than the LLCP header
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 18:46:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260714164629.75051-1-doruk@0sec.ai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260713221556.13a830b8@pumpkin>
> Is there a similar problem with non-linear skb?
> Maybe they can't get into this code, but who knows what can happen
> with unusual configs.
Good question. Today every skb that reaches __nfc_llcp_recv() is
linear: the target path (nci_rx_data_packet -> nci_add_rx_data_frag ->
nfc_tm_data_received) and the initiator path (nfc_data_exchange ->
nfc_llcp_recv) both build the frame with alloc_skb()/nci_skb_alloc()
plus skb_put()/skb_put_data(), and NCI reassembly uses skb_cow_head()
and skb_push() into the linear area. Nothing on the NFC receive side
attaches page frags or a frag_list, so skb->len == skb_headlen() and the
v2 skb->len test was in fact sufficient for the in-tree drivers.
But relying on that is fragile: the parser reads the header out of the
linear area (pdu->data[0]/data[1]) while skb->len is the total length,
so a non-linear skb with a short linear head would slip past a skb->len
test and still over-read the linear buffer. pskb_may_pull() is the
right guard here -- it also covers the non-linear case, and it matches
how the sibling NCI and HCI receive paths already validate their
headers.
I will send a v3 that uses:
if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, LLCP_HEADER_SIZE)) {
kfree_skb(skb);
return;
}
That is strictly stronger than the v2 check and does not reject any
valid frame -- pskb_may_pull() pulls the two header bytes into the
linear area when needed.
Thanks,
Doruk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-13 15:58 [PATCH net v2] nfc: llcp: reject PDUs shorter than the LLCP header Doruk Tan Ozturk
2026-07-13 21:15 ` David Laight
2026-07-14 16:46 ` Doruk Tan Ozturk [this message]
2026-07-14 20:53 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260714164629.75051-1-doruk@0sec.ai \
--to=doruk@0sec.ai \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=david@ixit.cz \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox