From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com (mail-wr1-f44.google.com [209.85.221.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DA7634CFC7 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2026 15:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.44 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784303637; cv=none; b=MpENlMrK253+ZNUsertJosUIPqae3oFg2A0RsHYSKhVOrimMMvsAtxbQNN/UjKZnL6wvE8Y+V2ZA+o3cpl0NINDtEV7WZtzXXUziA9BpSZnK0Z+QuteNc0/OaHO24VcrvMexWuLSESCQnPmCbBvpFVLYKhYQDpCBkk0mKZjVErI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784303637; c=relaxed/simple; bh=s3q9wJaNCd4aqGAfSgzhEmwkY7JI4EZuWLp6kixzQpo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=UKX42fffZU2LxcowL9h/NeVsUoi3IWi53KMc3B8BQbzrpwdiq8xdGjVUl9V+oe4OqvpbyJIccIVwW9O/MfwdbgXlFitNNKbZRa0I75sWg+oL4SzxhVnyuWLpS5710Bav3yKv29SpBdNUQb3Mt8Yfm1xKtT4wZw0xn6j4LguRunQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=N3FmyOuP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.44 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="N3FmyOuP" Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-47de0093c42so3758882f8f.3 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:53:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1784303633; x=1784908433; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=OyPjQCXherIdXkhKswzDtmo6q9pYSImGwr9J9riqS9s=; b=N3FmyOuPDYgK/grqBKI042mNXyrc/hEqM3Vmc4F13S2pLYIdCKLT2tr+bA/V1ve6WY hbk/iJexhTgzzc35d9bJ+a0B0dsWYNfajKvhxpatMVGMMaX0JCzsQ5RBA7oGB9T/N5r0 taCqj2S0CDTcmgtG9YA45J7ql3qa8w9V8WDZkWaDeCaGUIU4PouYKZbv5QnAJHnl2Xt5 gRyXHjzOINgvBmz0ud+o5l872WI1LADH8xEhWpMR+rYyEtV9UPEtAdJVlbxabb3846uG +VuK1oyJn2CWVxWEvE6UmCfX7d+tG9wuz1CK3EXW9LQ7DP62JcfdSnSAv0zhEtVlaTE5 I1/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1784303633; x=1784908433; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=OyPjQCXherIdXkhKswzDtmo6q9pYSImGwr9J9riqS9s=; b=rW8eJnO+Xu/cI1sgf3XcZdWhJ+yi2ItfDcin6IFGOYYMQgGDeHYtlS6g6ImHk+xIWc ELyjRlXWijMuQ2RiNIa4XDPRrw9CuRawVOsHZoZd/RUqodfXgd7OKtAbDAEizgT7PrF4 pLdgqIwb7FyQ0F7z6nyn23fVVSqjHgOo4QuhY7GEFiCblQCP4h28sdYTRZ5x4iYRbsr+ MS2ihMWNYdSeRnuCkrOFzE9vxqRs49ff3ywxr2JKs/OtlDbpWrKCbIMSlzP83RrbcPkh 2LJdLddMrm9dB/Iup0lMPuc0j/J2WLuQto2rNHcf782gF4lHKhuSHgqttuABfRW76xQc qJGA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+RrDgKmq5LENrqd3Ilf4GjRgrWlSKbgrWR+tII/Qxa0TAIkXEZKm2tpkwEuUXAKAD74hEhOLXyo=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyJ4SSaWSXbYL32juwM/Ip/Q/eeVnvBQzuxbMOXzWCJpINF6oCx L9f/w67nrAzCYSiwiZygEbv7Xs+o2TyhL4c7QIc+S5zkdHlwhqUbsOdU X-Gm-Gg: AfdE7cnIeOep392TTSJ4uBnBrahLYecr9QmxOfCrpLJD6shAeAl/DsWIeGljKHoae2K f/DGvTYvWwFeYEcfTb5MfQok2rfVPAO0NAwAcc2U7FljPxC5Tt5I+/ofhLj2em6MTFxQDLD4cTR fdmFIGexmioUA346oDi9MDUSy5AtgavfePC4JTvJvXoWseEQQgHl5Ph8M+49yAuQJWKLGQCiN46 YhtDOMgT676qB64rV9XXS7VsSVYvZtqCoRGKWD/4LaOTeZQizrECaLUpR6rHyuIxXUsZlwao1oy C45hgNy4cSielBzT3MwNY2SaQweOFn2ZYrWzIrzwjC/4kadGTZDJqWPFBxv7Be9Gq5iCxaP81ri kj8eoaCOBVsU1CGoQ7jdH+8XtjsZr0vn1cT/8723X+yYeQ/6z6yzejpTwwSz/9VtiFsIpYMCkqz /0i/xzCDKg3gtq+wyafhWgQNWh6VgRB0a6RQs4Q+E70JuRSkYlxWPRdL0lPpCh/e0e/YMmCoap6 gni X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2302:b0:47f:487c:ce7b with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-47f622f2c3fmr4212975f8f.7.1784303632688; Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:53:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (host86-153-201-25.range86-153.btcentralplus.com. [86.153.201.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-47f63edcf8dsm5321369f8f.27.2026.07.17.08.53.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:53:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Nnamdi Onyeyiri To: nnamdio@gmail.com Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org, jakub@cloudflare.com, jiayuan.chen@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, kuniyu@google.com, ncardwell@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 1/2] bpf, sockmap: handle spurious tcp_msg_wait_data() wakeup Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 16:53:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20260717155348.54975-2-nnamdio@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.52.0 In-Reply-To: <20260717155348.54975-1-nnamdio@gmail.com> References: <20260717155348.54975-1-nnamdio@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit recvfrom()/recv() are documented as only returning EAGAIN for blocking sockets when they have a receive timeout configured. However, adding a blocking ipv4 tcp socket without a receive timeout to a sockmap will cause EAGAIN errors sporadically. A socket with a receive timeout may return EAGAIN before the timeout expires. There are 2 code paths affected by this: 1. tcp_bpf_recvmsg() - Used when the socket has been added to a sockmap that has no verdict program attached. 2. tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser() - Used when the socket has been added to a sockmap that has a verdict program. To reproduce this issue, it is enough for the verdict program to do nothing but return SK_PASS. In both cases this happens when tcp_msg_wait_data() wakes spuriously (returning 0). To fix it, we now loop back to msg_bytes_ready instead of returning -EAGAIN on spurious wakeup. To ensure the looping does not cause sockets with a SO_RCVTIMEO set to wait excessively long, tcp_msg_wait_data() now takes a pointer to timeo, allowing sk_wait_event() to update it as appropriate. The logic in tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser() that allow it to handle signals, socket errors and closuers in its loop was also added to tcp_bpf_recvmsg(). Signed-off-by: Nnamdi Onyeyiri --- net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c index cc0bd73f36b6..aa5c5d741599 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir); #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL static int tcp_msg_wait_data(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, - long timeo) + long *timeo) { DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function); int ret = 0; @@ -187,12 +187,12 @@ static int tcp_msg_wait_data(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) return 1; - if (!timeo) + if (!*timeo) return ret; add_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait); sk_set_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA, sk); - ret = sk_wait_event(sk, &timeo, + ret = sk_wait_event(sk, timeo, !list_empty(&psock->ingress_msg) || !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue), &wait); sk_clear_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA, sk); @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk, int copied_from_self = 0; int copied = 0; u32 seq; + long timeo; if (unlikely(flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE)) return inet_recv_error(sk, msg, len); @@ -262,6 +263,8 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk, } } + timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT); + msg_bytes_ready: copied = __sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len, flags, &copied_from_self); /* The typical case for EFAULT is the socket was gracefully @@ -280,7 +283,6 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk, } seq += copied_from_self; if (!copied) { - long timeo; int data; if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE)) @@ -299,7 +301,6 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk, goto out; } - timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT); if (!timeo) { copied = -EAGAIN; goto out; @@ -310,13 +311,15 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk, goto out; } - data = tcp_msg_wait_data(sk, psock, timeo); + data = tcp_msg_wait_data(sk, psock, &timeo); if (data < 0) { copied = data; goto unlock; } if (data && !sk_psock_queue_empty(psock)) goto msg_bytes_ready; + if (!data && timeo > 0) + goto msg_bytes_ready; copied = -EAGAIN; } out: @@ -355,6 +358,7 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, { struct sk_psock *psock; int copied, ret; + long timeo; if (unlikely(flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE)) return inet_recv_error(sk, msg, len); @@ -371,14 +375,59 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, return tcp_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags); } lock_sock(sk); + + timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT); + msg_bytes_ready: copied = sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len, flags); if (!copied) { - long timeo; int data; - timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT); - data = tcp_msg_wait_data(sk, psock, timeo); + if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE)) { + ret = 0; + goto unlock; + } + + if (sk->sk_err) { + if (!sk_psock_queue_empty(psock)) + goto msg_bytes_ready; + if (!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) { + release_sock(sk); + sk_psock_put(sk, psock); + return tcp_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags); + } + ret = sock_error(sk); + goto unlock; + } + + if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) { + if (!sk_psock_queue_empty(psock)) + goto msg_bytes_ready; + if (!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) { + release_sock(sk); + sk_psock_put(sk, psock); + return tcp_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags); + } + ret = 0; + goto unlock; + } + + if (sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE) { + ret = -ENOTCONN; + goto unlock; + } + + if (!timeo) { + ret = -EAGAIN; + goto unlock; + } + + if (signal_pending(current)) { + ret = sock_intr_errno(timeo); + goto unlock; + } + + data = tcp_msg_wait_data(sk, psock, &timeo); if (data < 0) { ret = data; goto unlock; @@ -390,6 +439,8 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, sk_psock_put(sk, psock); return tcp_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags); } + if (!data && timeo > 0) + goto msg_bytes_ready; copied = -EAGAIN; } ret = copied; -- 2.52.0