From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB88826D4CA for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784542847; cv=none; b=L5zE0VvScLWsmLOoEYtj99Q4DRFGpl6NYfg68BQYMJPRfiqIdpDwrhUmNHImm3+RqA5nU2aXt3jVCeMY/pRk4HD8B4wT3eKfST7f0CeXm1A1Jb3pqJd2nla+hP95R910sFUaRlnteCn2q16aFGI2eMjDPIhPSdwtoedH1aM4Y+U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784542847; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HsJu/oeZkgrbMRQJplNCCxvCknHoMa9stmN3nySY0Kw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VVU98X95WVlQQV7NCoZPtD9CvpWFUqCjFHxl95+SX9ylodpFZX8qEXn87DfUocGAHHKQpaxHe833BkXVN5O9QgD4TtONY36WXK7bhOxDsMS5PU1LiNYiuD7JCg5+PtvV8CndxG47R27y6HTPqdw4XAO7VhqMeg0YKN5/iH3RwQY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Mjh+DFYb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Mjh+DFYb" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 705FC1F000E9; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:20:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784542846; bh=flOputq0F1qDtEH4RgZe2aKJKIjg+JYbpkOo9KKbYTU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Mjh+DFYbdkU0Qkrb3ZH/TZZARuS5ejj2Bk02pjrHoRe9WBRXqtIc6gOopPc8WU3Ct KMKzrh3JxJhaO4rb3r4UGi99i8o6tRsE8PlcP5Kcrg6UJ1qqAAoV8eTXUG+d2F3YJo 6A1OZHIzfIgXK2CS4YT8OJ5Bs171ifWkMMF8pMmQD2eeouwBee6N37aev83WOUaUxm AU9Nfy+ELaMpNwscTgtP2RRuvYIWYXhmfHLITDd6QtMf+lgCtQP+oFNXl8s73N5MrU PbkhogmG59HNp0QggiLn5U8+/K0oOHRvqDuSmlD05WKG7gTI//GiXYqsd4nFcx1yL5 pAbTl7TScS9rQ== Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:20:42 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Takashi Kozu Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kohei.enju@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v1] igb: remove ASSERT_RTNL() from igb_write_rss_key() Message-ID: <20260720102042.GE19108@horms.kernel.org> References: <20260711133239.29270-2-takkozu@amazon.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260711133239.29270-2-takkozu@amazon.com> On Sat, Jul 11, 2026 at 10:32:15PM +0900, Takashi Kozu wrote: > igb_runtime_resume() calls __igb_resume() with rpm=true, which > skips rtnl_lock() to avoid deadlocks. On that path __igb_open() > -> igb_configure() -> igb_setup_mrqc() -> igb_write_rss_key() > runs without rtnl held, so ASSERT_RTNL() fires a false-positive > WARN on every runtime resume. Drop it. Hi Takashi, I think this patch description needs to explain why it is safe to run igb_write_rss_key() without holding RTNL. > > Fixes: dfaf57ef99cf ("igb: prepare for RSS key get/set support") > Signed-off-by: Takashi Kozu ...