From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Yizhou Zhao <zhaoyz24@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>, pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yuxiang Yang <yangyx22@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>,
Ao Wang <wangao@seu.edu.cn>, Xuewei Feng <fengxw06@126.com>,
Qi Li <qli01@tsinghua.edu.cn>, Ke Xu <xuke@tsinghua.edu.cn>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: require matching source address for route hint reuse
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:16:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720121629.GA2309447@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714122618.21698-1-zhaoyz24@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 08:26:17PM +0800, Yizhou Zhao wrote:
> IPv4 list receive can reuse a route from the previous skb in the same
> receive batch. The current eligibility check only compares the destination
> address and TOS before calling ip_route_use_hint().
>
> For forwarded routes, ip_route_use_hint() skips fib_validate_source()
> unless the hinted route is local. This means a packet with a different
> source address can reuse a forwarding dst created for an earlier packet
> and avoid source validation such as strict rp_filter.
I'm not sure why we are skipping source validation for non-local routes.
The comment above ip_route_use_hint() says "Implements all the
saddr-related checks as ip_route_input_slow()". I agree that
ip_route_input_slow() only does source validation for RTN_LOCAL, but for
RTN_UNICAST it is calling ip_mkroute_input(), which eventually calls
fib_validate_source().
Paolo, WDYT about always performing source validation [1]?
>
> In a KASAN QEMU router with strict rp_filter on the ingress device, a
Why mention KASAN? How is it related to this bug / patch?
> bad-only burst was dropped entirely, however, a paired valid/bad burst
> with the same destination/TOS made all of the bad packets pass rp_filter.
>
> Require the source address to match before reusing the hint. Packets from
> the same source/destination/TOS still take the fast path; packets whose
> source changes go through the normal route lookup and source validation
> path.
I agree that it fixes the problem, but we will always pay the
performance penalty, even when rp_filter is disabled. According to
commit 02b24941619f ("ipv4: use dst hint for ipv4 list receive"), there
is still a performance gain when we perform the source validation
per-packet.
[1]
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 3f3de5164d6e..89338111793b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -2194,6 +2194,7 @@ ip_route_use_hint(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 daddr, __be32 saddr,
struct rtable *rt = skb_rtable(hint);
struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
u32 tag = 0;
+ int oif = 0;
if (!in_dev)
return reason;
@@ -2214,14 +2215,13 @@ ip_route_use_hint(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 daddr, __be32 saddr,
}
if (!(rt->rt_flags & RTCF_LOCAL))
- goto skip_validate_source;
+ oif = dst_dev_rcu(&rt->dst)->ifindex;
- reason = fib_validate_source_reason(skb, saddr, daddr, dscp, 0, dev,
+ reason = fib_validate_source_reason(skb, saddr, daddr, dscp, oif, dev,
in_dev, &tag);
if (reason)
goto martian_source;
-skip_validate_source:
skb_dst_copy(skb, hint);
return SKB_NOT_DROPPED_YET;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 12:26 [PATCH net] ipv4: require matching source address for route hint reuse Yizhou Zhao
2026-07-20 12:16 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720121629.GA2309447@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fengxw06@126.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=qli01@tsinghua.edu.cn \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangao@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=xuke@tsinghua.edu.cn \
--cc=yangyx22@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn \
--cc=zhaoyz24@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox