From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D73E2D3A7C; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784652168; cv=none; b=ruxZNewuRRV25qXjaiduBPxkLfnNbL/niQc3stURWJfnKYkN17NdaBsWRLy8CZqLS8Wn/dv3gLtx9m3xCZPBTTngfG/e2QHDtmgCJ9Mu21sFwA+PW4IpSdj/2z4V6PGfPHLvhNIHcH319hxepyEMtHJCG8bM8lgPJcF1BM2hu00= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784652168; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HQUGBDFR1nv9TsBox3bGaaNweZhMIXs2dEs/QWbZJBo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZYXjU+iEIdgqUwcU0GoyYkSk42P9nD7/IQ0aD8JEJ8mR1P37g9DkailtQakmm0tbYaJFnz/teGH2T2wz7FQW3zyX6Ch57013gfvYcXYqkrpbMJYw3vXX4RFLIQYiGeFlEdVJYu8iiPNr8YcS5I71YE+br0L/NaDVxR7v39IUMIo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bEr+lfzH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bEr+lfzH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CC0F1F000E9; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:42:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784652167; bh=B5qM9chBCdVYWvuZvuUKvIvKfuTex0gYLfS3OQl7ilc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=bEr+lfzHr9tBe8KVs+4dUMAA8Y8DzbSXuACDc+80BtqwzrrEkkvDysl32+0Ne2qSc sCPcQrw6uC3ltYQ+72SZrlCKOAlqk38JGmlHfNCbXhuHfpFilXI6zRmfiKkAtGi9/T 7R4qZsppur1nLm7j0nLgidKDJNCoKsR8dFWRf6uP2cIZ2b+IcP50AIb59Hw3EVdBJV d15Uge/sHXdAqkU23jfioEhGDN6fGYaJlCsvXNUPqv9CMMD7SABn1RfTVHFniRRIEt 6PjfNWVVx8a8gCKjFCT1BmgHlr4HBmCJXyd0SxvSDlzj/+FmFwcYQTx3OC6MjFI4H/ BwqjmhFtTEWAQ== Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:42:45 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Maxime Chevallier Cc: Andrew Lunn , davem@davemloft.net, Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Russell King , thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, Alexis =?UTF-8?B?TG90aG9yw6k=?= , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: Simplify ioctl handling Message-ID: <20260721094245.1b6aab2d@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260718143848.677531-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> References: <20260718143848.677531-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 18 Jul 2026 16:38:47 +0200 Maxime Chevallier wrote: > Now that timestamping is controlled through an NDO, we can simply > call phylink_mii_ioctl() to handle ioctls. > > The only functional difference is that phylink_mii_ioctl() -> > phy_mii_ioctl() can handle SIOCSHWTSTAMP, but this no longer happens > as this ioctl is not longer dispatched to the ndo_eth_ioctl(). To double check - the discussion is orthogonal and this patch can be applied as is?