Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ibrahim Hashimov <security@auditcode.ai>
To: dust.li@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com,
	hexlabsecurity@proton.me, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
	guwen@linux.alibaba.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: validate peer CDC cursor against RMBE size before accepting it
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 12:29:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260722102929.38218-1-security@auditcode.ai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <amA9XGOWH3z4Z1fu@linux.alibaba.com>

> I believe Bryam already sent a similar patch to the mailist and I have
> already reviewed it.
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260705-b4-disp-28a1bbca-v4-1-be089b98acc6@proton.me/

Thanks Dust -- yes, that fixes the same bug, so please drop mine. (I sent
a v2 earlier today, before I saw your note, in reply to a sashiko review;
please disregard it as a competing patch.)

One thing worth checking on Bryam's series, though: bounding only the cursor
count (clamping temp.count to rmb_desc->len) still leaves the advance
unbounded. smc_curs_diff() on a wrap increment returns
(size - old.count) + new.count, so a peer that sends prod (wrap=W, count=0)
then prod (wrap=W+1, count=size) makes diff_prod ~= 2*size even though both
counts are in range. smc_cdc_msg_recv_action() then atomic_add()s that into
bytes_to_rcv without clamping (despite the "0 <= bytes_to_rcv <=
rmb_desc->len" comment) -- which is exactly what smc_rx_recvmsg()'s second
copy chunk trusts.

A sashiko review of my patch flagged the same gap; I bounded the advance
too, with:

	if (smc_curs_diff(size, &old, &temp) > size)
		return;

Might be worth folding into Bryam's version. Happy to send it as a
follow-up if that helps.

Thanks,
Ibrahim

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-22 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-20 17:07 [PATCH net] net/smc: validate peer CDC cursor against RMBE size before accepting it Ibrahim Hashimov
2026-07-22  3:47 ` Dust Li
2026-07-22 10:29   ` Ibrahim Hashimov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260722102929.38218-1-security@auditcode.ai \
    --to=security@auditcode.ai \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox