From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: manizada@pm.me
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com,
jasowangio@gmail.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tun: prevent underflow in rx headroom calculation
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:14:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260723171437.784955-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260721014117.2234892-1-manizada@pm.me>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
tun: prevent underflow in rx headroom calculation
This patch clamps good_linear to zero in tun_get_user() so that a large
tun->align value coming from ndo_set_rx_headroom() does not cause
SKB_MAX_HEAD(align) to underflow into a huge size_t when assigned to the
linear variable, and later cause the skb data pointer to end up outside
the allocated head.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index ffbe6f13fb1f..d3be0f2d5df8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -1780,6 +1780,7 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
> }
>
> good_linear = SKB_MAX_HEAD(align);
> + good_linear = max(good_linear, 0);
[High]
Does this fully cover the IFF_TAP path when align is large enough that
SKB_MAX_HEAD(align) is <= 0?
With the clamp, good_linear becomes 0, and later in tun_get_user() the
non-zerocopy path does:
copylen = len;
linear = min(hdr_len, good_linear);
...
if (!linear)
linear = min_t(size_t, good_linear, copylen);
skb = tun_alloc_skb(tfile, align, copylen, linear, noblock);
so linear ends up 0 and the resulting skb has skb_headlen(skb) == 0.
For IFF_TAP without IFF_NAPI_FRAGS the code then calls:
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, tun->dev);
eth_type_trans() -> eth_skb_pull_mac() -> __skb_pull(skb, ETH_HLEN),
and __skb_pull() has:
if (unlikely(skb->len < skb->data_len))
BUG();
Since skb->len and skb->data_len both start at the packet length and
skb->len is decremented by ETH_HLEN in the pull, would this reach the
BUG() when a user writes to /dev/net/tun with tun->align pushed above
the SKB_MAX_HEAD threshold via the OVS/netkit/VXLAN stacking described
in the commit message?
The pre-existing behavior at align == 3776 appears to hit the same
BUG() and align > 3776 pre-patch corrupted memory before reaching it,
so this change is an improvement, but would forcing linear >= ETH_HLEN
in the IFF_TAP path (or calling pskb_may_pull() before eth_type_trans()
regardless of the frags flag) be needed to close the remaining panic?
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-23 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 1:43 [PATCH net] tun: prevent underflow in rx headroom calculation Asim Viladi Oglu Manizada
2026-07-21 7:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-07-22 21:25 ` manizada
2026-07-23 17:14 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-07-24 5:27 ` manizada
2026-07-25 21:37 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260723171437.784955-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=manizada@pm.me \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox