From: "Cen Zhang (Microsoft)" <blbllhy@gmail.com>
To: magnus.karlsson@intel.com, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com,
sdf@fomichev.me, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com,
tgopinath@linux.microsoft.com, kys@microsoft.com,
blbllhy@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH net v2] xsk: fix NULL pointer dereference in __xsk_rcv()
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:42:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260725034246.192091-1-blbllhy@gmail.com> (raw)
In the __xsk_rcv() multi-buffer path, xsk_buff_alloc() is called in a
loop without checking its return value. xsk_buff_can_alloc() only
counts fill queue entries without validating their addresses, so it
can succeed while xsk_buff_alloc() rejects all remaining entries and
returns NULL.
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
0xdffffc0000000000
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range
[0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]
RIP: 0010:__xsk_rcv+0x426/0xc20 (net/xdp/xsk.c:350)
Call Trace:
xsk_generic_rcv+0x26d/0x5f0
xdp_do_generic_redirect+0x3c5/0xcf0
do_xdp_generic+0x92f/0xe70
__netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0xf7e/0x2b30
Fix this with a two-stage transaction. First allocate and stage all
buffers required for the packet, recycling all staged buffers with
xsk_buff_free() if any allocation fails. Only after this stage
succeeds, copy the data, reserve the RX descriptors, and release the
buffers in an error-free loop.
Fixes: 804627751b42 ("xsk: add support for AF_XDP multi-buffer on Rx path")
Reported-by: AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com
Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang (Microsoft) <blbllhy@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- Allocate all packet buffers before reserving RX descriptors.
- Recycle partially allocated buffers instead of only cancelling the
RX producer reservations.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260724164719.99563-1-blbllhy@gmail.com
net/xdp/xsk.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c
index f906d51b6699..383fc2b1de48 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xsk.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c
@@ -298,9 +298,11 @@ static int __xsk_rcv(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 len)
u32 frame_size = __xsk_pool_get_rx_frame_size(xs->pool);
void *copy_from = xsk_copy_xdp_start(xdp), *copy_to;
u32 from_len, meta_len, rem, num_desc;
- struct xdp_buff_xsk *xskb;
+ struct xdp_buff_xsk *xskb, *tmp;
struct xdp_buff *xsk_xdp;
+ LIST_HEAD(xsk_buffs);
skb_frag_t *frag;
+ u32 i;
from_len = xdp->data_end - copy_from;
meta_len = xdp->data - copy_from;
@@ -343,23 +345,44 @@ static int __xsk_rcv(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 len)
frag = &sinfo->frags[0];
}
+ for (i = 0; i < num_desc; i++) {
+ xsk_xdp = xsk_buff_alloc(xs->pool);
+ if (!xsk_xdp)
+ goto err_alloc;
+
+ xskb = container_of(xsk_xdp, struct xdp_buff_xsk, xdp);
+ if (unlikely(!list_empty(&xskb->list_node)))
+ goto err_alloc;
+ list_add_tail(&xskb->list_node, &xsk_buffs);
+ }
+
do {
u32 to_len = frame_size + meta_len;
u32 copied;
- xsk_xdp = xsk_buff_alloc(xs->pool);
+ xskb = list_first_entry(&xsk_buffs, struct xdp_buff_xsk,
+ list_node);
+ list_del_init(&xskb->list_node);
+ xsk_xdp = &xskb->xdp;
copy_to = xsk_xdp->data - meta_len;
copied = xsk_copy_xdp(copy_to, ©_from, to_len, &from_len, &frag, rem);
rem -= copied;
- xskb = container_of(xsk_xdp, struct xdp_buff_xsk, xdp);
__xsk_rcv_zc_safe(xs, xskb, copied - meta_len,
rem ? XDP_PKT_CONTD : 0);
meta_len = 0;
} while (rem);
return 0;
+
+err_alloc:
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(xskb, tmp, &xsk_buffs, list_node) {
+ list_del_init(&xskb->list_node);
+ xsk_buff_free(&xskb->xdp);
+ }
+ xs->rx_dropped++;
+ return -ENOMEM;
}
static bool xsk_tx_writeable(struct xdp_sock *xs)
--
2.53.0
reply other threads:[~2026-07-25 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260725034246.192091-1-blbllhy@gmail.com \
--to=blbllhy@gmail.com \
--cc=AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=tgopinath@linux.microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox