From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E5063F1ADC for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 23:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785196271; cv=none; b=g+MAtaNoFOf/69dIdSU9UI0ZOaNXsZTMqvOVMin+yFe8ITr9De+OGGfzmhqd0XzJm8y6P0OpVf82fjhpnCzlxVcXkumb7p4OuV6mR2FMdbaeGZHlcjH5hKjB4EC5GYqefiO5vpmMHkI4tPwrdwxcz7l7Sak6G1j7VKx47LGhTZY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785196271; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9nn3i7bcx8QJbTZo2Ok9+vuHdnZSdIiMKrhjoqrSm6M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=udLQ9HAtKL/oRlHjOS2nEkLOSdAYtp+sfhjyVUduoxLQwG78SglofXMDnSIQX86YbpuXmHPhvwpWdWCKVHGxtq+DN+j+VIQ/Yy8d0A43Aj5agN9P22/eJn5sgb/A2j1JHyhdSi4bmOyD/3naVsil5AcLwEghihYr3Yy5g2ci21Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WzpzhHSY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WzpzhHSY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9C111F000E9; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 23:51:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785196270; bh=qQKwN2wPl2/Y4x5vLyHKnHImlk+WQ7G1MEW1/p3rjmE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=WzpzhHSYGXyWhlNlhwFCUUzHXJval/yD74nEhzmnqBhE7K+YJcFcu04TxrWK3R3IX KRzFFpGxwbaUGdA21qhn/zDLwt6jxpklzZjFStHk7zyX5w83F5FtaOWU9HEmZxS/IX 3jfedgXLIjLtskKrMg7M4YGqDbyIeLduT0FcVxBDXJJy1SvY10cC3jtzAdwcL2OsIm zaP5UHgBcZYnj7Ru7PqHy+ZT7TrGFYzFjUzbukhuGE5NU5JZ84vmZQx5cRSkxXBOep KeQkS5V90Lqc2y4BPpiMhZQ899p5zWB1CDBgpBEGdbafYi4smJO9dheRQaxBcDP9u4 4EVwwSqt4PatQ== Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 16:51:09 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Willem de Bruijn Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, andrew@lunn.ch, mohsin.bashr@gmail.com, Willem de Bruijn Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/7] net: ethtool: add hardware pacing offload support to rings Message-ID: <20260727165109.439c0f74@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260726202902.760552-2-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> References: <20260726202902.760552-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> <20260726202902.760552-2-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 26 Jul 2026 16:28:45 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote: > Add two ethtool rings operations: > > - get pacing offload horizon: active and max > - set pacing offload horizon: active Could you spare a few words on the fact that we already have IFLA_MAX_PACING_OFFLOAD_HORIZON? Since it's already there and patch 3 only adds device level configuration (not per ring), sticking to rtnl seems tempting?