From: Simon Schippers <simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Willem de Bruijn" <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowangio@gmail.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Tim Gebauer" <tim.gebauer@tu-dortmund.de>,
"Brett Sheffield" <brett@librecast.net>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Simon Schippers" <simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/4] Revert "tun/tap & vhost-net: avoid ptr_ring tail-drop when a qdisc is present"
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 11:22:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728092240.250257-2-simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728092240.250257-1-simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
This reverts commit 1d6e569b7d0c0b2736636749e4be0a27f3cefcb3.
The commit stops the netdev queue when the ptr_ring is full instead of
dropping the packet. My own tests showed no relevant regression, but on
Brett Sheffield's librecast testbed an IPv6 multicast testcase got
slower. With 8 iperf3 TCP threads sending, the throughput dropped from
13.5 Gbit/s to 9.13 Gbit/s.
Reported-by: Brett Sheffield <brett@librecast.net>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/akVnoOYQOrt8k-Gu@karahi.librecast.net/
Signed-off-by: Simon Schippers <simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
---
drivers/net/tun.c | 25 ++-----------------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index ffbe6f13fb1f..ec5573f545af 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -1018,7 +1018,6 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
struct netdev_queue *queue;
struct tun_file *tfile;
int len = skb->len;
- int ret;
rcu_read_lock();
tfile = rcu_dereference(tun->tfiles[txq]);
@@ -1073,33 +1072,13 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
nf_reset_ct(skb);
- queue = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, txq);
-
- spin_lock(&tfile->tx_ring.producer_lock);
- ret = __ptr_ring_produce(&tfile->tx_ring, skb);
- if (!qdisc_txq_has_no_queue(queue) &&
- __ptr_ring_check_produce(&tfile->tx_ring) == -ENOSPC) {
- netif_tx_stop_queue(queue);
- /* Paired with smp_mb() in __tun_wake_queue() */
- smp_mb__after_atomic();
- if (!__ptr_ring_check_produce(&tfile->tx_ring))
- netif_tx_wake_queue(queue);
- }
- spin_unlock(&tfile->tx_ring.producer_lock);
-
- if (ret) {
- /* This should be a rare case if a qdisc is present, but
- * can happen due to lltx.
- * Since skb_tx_timestamp(), skb_orphan(),
- * run_ebpf_filter() and pskb_trim() could have tinkered
- * with the SKB, returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY is unsafe and
- * we must drop instead.
- */
+ if (ptr_ring_produce(&tfile->tx_ring, skb)) {
drop_reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_FULL_RING;
goto drop;
}
/* dev->lltx requires to do our own update of trans_start */
+ queue = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, txq);
txq_trans_cond_update(queue);
/* Notify and wake up reader process */
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 9:22 [PATCH net 0/4] Revert "tun/tap & vhost-net: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops" Simon Schippers
2026-07-28 9:22 ` Simon Schippers [this message]
2026-07-28 9:22 ` [PATCH net 2/4] Revert "ptr_ring: move free-space check into separate helper" Simon Schippers
2026-07-28 9:22 ` [PATCH net 3/4] Revert "vhost-net: wake queue of tun/tap after ptr_ring consume" Simon Schippers
2026-07-28 9:22 ` [PATCH net 4/4] Revert "tun/tap: add ptr_ring consume helper with netdev queue wakeup" Simon Schippers
2026-07-28 19:22 ` [PATCH net 0/4] Revert "tun/tap & vhost-net: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops" Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-30 0:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260728092240.250257-2-simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de \
--to=simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=brett@librecast.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tim.gebauer@tu-dortmund.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox