From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 653A3238166; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785286164; cv=none; b=BHQzdfcV6u/Z3qJU9UEAXI4799HpHQS5syp5wXHTKAMGoNMamnkYCXuku1z64w6sV4Np9J+JHkDAq2docDZ18yumZkIQsd0xPbMpuUVmxPQ35MP2c8MrHQRb1kPQZFQMPxfxI4tzmQQUlghvlQO1IH7elItqUVNax3+2o9TfiGA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785286164; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xoJGtND626UWEWmxoA3fheCnQHlT+Y4luHK5UydBsyg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uQ1hFjF9sepYh0dppvyl85z6xFMqSCuIYoxAR346oeAiPSM3GG0EwW+s/WdHrheUyl3E9Qrlf7CJIhZKRXkQEudQlTrT4a8GVhFjs2M+Zrw4+TyTTS3O6TrPloFJ1j47JSF1o/aYvLsFy0jQ1IhV90VX4yJzGWzcLvxRgthOZ0E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=d08+wsIU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="d08+wsIU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88CF21F000E9; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:49:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785286162; bh=xoJGtND626UWEWmxoA3fheCnQHlT+Y4luHK5UydBsyg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=d08+wsIUlf8pCCbbjwvJ6v/kZPmM2r15j4/17T/5MGSxx7o5QP81p6LhZQzIZRVFD SZ3RI/YQmllzKTkNLHDKjbeL99lIZKlR5ASbEskO17dE6eIiTlloFKmBZdMa1zN+nO pNiLFhwPbc0Y4ETZ6ooiap6jOGW6YMRSAsrN3dJvtjXHKBmCWlJC2hAgf/Ve+Qsbhj 70zlJx4B2xO4gBTbWMUAKtznRqv4V7yKkPncFYqM8svKong7xntU1Z7AGzYKUmXe+m b1mIX3tu/+7qmZW727zQKjnKbOOpMntPK+7tpj/+TXMWyAN6ZxoMin7lcyIl265LVe GTuC6Qhyxwibg== Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:49:21 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Cc: , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 2/2] dinghai: add hardware register access and PCI capability scanning Message-ID: <20260728174921.1db84efe@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <202607201814508607WgwfRziVS5D44YN2_V69@zte.com.cn> References: <20260720180651288d3b9DAp__Lfvo2x2PkMfC@zte.com.cn> <202607201814508607WgwfRziVS5D44YN2_V69@zte.com.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:14:50 +0800 (CST) han.junyang@zte.com.cn wrote: > Implement PCI configuration space access, BAR mapping, capability > scanning (common/notify/device), and hardware queue register > definitions for DingHai PF device. Sashiko has a bunch of complaints about bounds checking here. My understanding is that we don't have to worry about malicious PFs but please double check if any of the complains are worth addressing https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720180651288d3b9DAp__Lfvo2x2PkMfC%40zte.com.cn