Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	davem@davemloft.net, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: "Maxime Chevallier" <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
	thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
	"Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: stmmac: Cleanup rx coalescing computation when using RIWT
Date: Sun,  2 Aug 2026 13:40:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260802114015.214212-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> (raw)

Currently when configuring interrupt coalescing on devices that relies
on the Receive Interrupt Watchdog Timer feature of dwmac, the
computation of the RIWT timings leads to off-by-one values when
reporting the timings back to userspace.

RIWT works by arming a watchdog timer upon receiving frames with the RI
bit not set in the descriptor. The timer duration is expressed in units
of 256 stmmac clock ticks, and therefore requires a bit of computation
to derive it :

riwt = (rx_usecs * n_clk_ticks_per_usec) / 256

and conversely

rx_usecs = (riwt * 256) / n_clk_ticks_per_usec

This computation as-is leads to a consistent off-by-one when setting
then getting back the rx-usecs value due to rounding errors (by truncation):

ethtool -C eth1 rx-usecs 42
ethtool -c eth1
 -> reports rx-usecs: 41

Let's use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST instead for the computations. It does have
one side effect, the accepted boundaries for rx-usecs also shifts by one
now, going from [16us, 246us] to [15us, 245us]. For that reason, I'm not
targeting the net tree here, and it's overall a very small issue.

Maxime

Maxime Chevallier (2):
  net: stmmac: ethtool: Comment the magic numbers in RIWT computation
  net: stmmac: ethtool: Address off-by-one when reading the coal
    rx-usecs

 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.55.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-08-02 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-02 11:40 Maxime Chevallier [this message]
2026-08-02 11:40 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: stmmac: ethtool: Comment the magic numbers in RIWT computation Maxime Chevallier
2026-08-02 15:02   ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-02 11:40 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: stmmac: ethtool: Address off-by-one when reading the coal rx-usecs Maxime Chevallier
2026-08-02 15:05   ` Andrew Lunn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260802114015.214212-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --to=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox