From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39B0D3EDAC9 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2026 22:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785881670; cv=none; b=u/Mxz8DlsRFJgq9RYYJ5epzL4N6MSiaY13ilnfAGo9KeG4ZQ9ZO7EltCWW8ifZ6zRGey8ODXnyB8HFktFuc2hD083PtTuQefYZspi2q/mP2PAH+j2XI9syKIy/bIww67rQJkHg+/IHJm/Dhm8QCI5k87NhrfTZV6NbXhW+V7SK0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785881670; c=relaxed/simple; bh=d/6I5mE7wKZ54JY8JigfzcP9itrXBO+fVDjh4g4MUa0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=l2H8B4QLoI0Ities4Ha6n24Nn+QktXBHmInMQRUiTg0jTtsstwfHqnUD8NAfEePQTnVuBGDKUy3VpYuQHSDWG1o6etaV6UmA1TYAJlNyabJehFPW9CvDdujF7c6McbRZuM9VZMIJNhWaJhRHq3DP7akwleXyn7hq5YiClhAS+04= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OzxZO806; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OzxZO806" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9D471F000E9; Tue, 4 Aug 2026 22:14:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785881669; bh=Ktqovc+lxDsREFegvleHGmLzqwtF/O4V72Ce1vxAsas=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=OzxZO806s/U8yG1THKDeyEokGM53o3vTecIFgqApjZdYCioHn9j8DBHdRWllTFwHm U3RTLEUwWyp19FjdMqsXWKwVMXh89UjytFvz55wxtIJz0ERnNBx9BGQ5pLQHc/diiF 2MqhcEbUtsVz4sVeSMJkxYlkzI3XY/ymkKrXUT/KkzHJE527Neh4YQGTec/ngadX2A b2IJ8mRB5KIAAj/x0CyQfPBUeSZZJA2fN8nKUSl4BimBa7aLsxFtu9Ahr35CxaVgpR DjokoIg/bX0n146uH3vHydbs2lbtwrN8ufTvUR56urzsA4M5fVXv6ZWWqAXCUJTC0Y dRHgjqV1/+CxA== Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 15:14:27 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Paolo Abeni Cc: Sven Eckelmann , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Simon Horman , b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org, Simon Wunderlich , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] pull request for net-next: batman-adv 2026-07-28 Message-ID: <20260804151427.48602ee8@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260728133918.643267-1-sw@simonwunderlich.de> <5248054.31r3eYUQgx@sven-desktop> <37153ad1-5c96-49fc-adee-2a7678414428@redhat.com> <4072288.fW5hKsROvD@sven-l14> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 20:32:21 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote: > > Sorry, I am lost. There is stuff for which people have actual PoC code. Afaik, > > nothing for an RCE but enough to locally be a minor annoyance. The things > > which have no "Reported-by" are things which I have problems with on my > > installations. > > > > And about the others: The "bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim > > add" + "prevent CRC corruptions after claim flush" were a problems I had (next > > to another which was not yet posted to netdev) but has a "Reported-by: > > Sashiko" because it was also reported by Sashiko when posting other bla > > patches and I think I've stolen the example from the commit message partially > > from the Sashiko report. > > I'm sorry this is getting more complicated than really intended. The > rule of thumb is that real problems actually bothering users go into the > 'net' tree, and other stuff goes into net-next without the fixes tag. My rule of thumb is "there is no such thing as 'worth backporting but not worth net'". People tend to send to -next fixes they didn't bother testing.