Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: jiawenwu@trustnetic.com
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, mengyuanlou@net-swift.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, joe@dama.to, u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com,
	weirongguang@kylinos.cn, larysa.zaremba@intel.com,
	horms@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: ngbe: fix NULL pointer dereference in non-MSI-X interrupt enabling
Date: Thu,  6 Aug 2026 08:31:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806153138.2580692-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5FE44222ED3FAC4B+20260803072022.377406-1-jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>

This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
net: ngbe: fix NULL pointer dereference in non-MSI-X interrupt enabling

This patch avoids dereferencing wx->msix_entry in NGBE_INTR_MISC() when the
device is not running in MSI-X mode, by testing pdev->msix_enabled in
ngbe_irq_enable() and falling back to a hard-coded mask value otherwise.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/ngbe/ngbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/ngbe/ngbe_main.c
> index a16221995909..cb653861aad8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/ngbe/ngbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/ngbe/ngbe_main.c
> @@ -180,8 +180,10 @@ static void ngbe_irq_enable(struct wx *wx, bool queues)
>  	/* mask interrupt */
>  	if (queues)
>  		wx_intr_enable(wx, NGBE_INTR_ALL);
> -	else
> +	else if (wx->pdev->msix_enabled)
>  		wx_intr_enable(wx, NGBE_INTR_MISC(wx));
> +	else
> +		wx_intr_enable(wx, BIT(0));
>  }

[Severity: Medium]
Is BIT(0) the right mask bit for the misc cause in the non-MSI-X case?

In the MSI/INTx fallback, wx_set_interrupt_capability() sets
wx->num_q_vectors = 1, and ngbe_up() -> wx_configure_vectors() still
programs the misc IVAR:

drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c:wx_configure_vectors() {
	...
	wx_set_ivar(wx, -1, 0, v_idx);
}

with v_idx == wx->num_q_vectors == 1.  wx_set_ivar() only forces the
other-causes vector to 0 when WX_FLAG_IRQ_VECTOR_SHARED is set, which
happens for wx_mac_em with num_vfs == 7 in __wx_enable_sriov():

	if (test_bit(WX_FLAG_IRQ_VECTOR_SHARED, wx->flags))
		msix_vector = 0;

So in plain MSI/INTx the misc cause sits at bit 1, and bit 0 is queue
vector 0.  Does this branch then clear the wrong bit in PX_IMC, leaving
the misc cause masked while unmasking the queue cause?

The queue cause looks like it is meant to stay masked here, per
ngbe_intr():

	/* would disable interrupts here but it is auto disabled */
	napi_schedule_irqoff(&q_vector->napi);

	if (!test_bit(WX_STATE_DOWN, wx->state))
		ngbe_irq_enable(wx, false);

and wx_poll() is the place that re-arms it after NAPI completes:

	wx_intr_enable(wx, WX_INTR_Q(q_vector->v_idx));

Can unmasking BIT(0) from the hard IRQ handler let the device re-assert
the (possibly shared) INTx/MSI line while NAPI is still scheduled,
leading to repeated hard-IRQ entries and, on the eicr == 0 path, to
IRQ_NONE returns followed by a full NGBE_INTR_ALL unmask?

Would BIT(wx->num_q_vectors) be the value that preserves the behaviour
prior to commit 4174c0c331a2, where NGBE_INTR_MISC(A) expanded to
BIT((A)->num_q_vectors)?  The sibling driver still uses that form
unconditionally, including on its non-MSI-X path:

drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_type.h:
	#define TXGBE_INTR_MISC(A)	BIT((A)->num_q_vectors)

One more note on the changelog: it says the fix is to check
pdev->msix_enabled "to determine the correct vector index", but it does
not mention that the mask value written in non-MSI-X mode changes from
BIT(1) to BIT(0).  Could the changelog spell out the intended vector
index for the MSI/INTx case?
-- 
pw-bot: cr

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-06 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-03  7:20 [PATCH net v2] net: ngbe: fix NULL pointer dereference in non-MSI-X interrupt enabling Jiawen Wu
2026-08-03 12:35 ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-06 15:31 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260806153138.2580692-1-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiawenwu@trustnetic.com \
    --cc=joe@dama.to \
    --cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
    --cc=mengyuanlou@net-swift.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
    --cc=weirongguang@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox