From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA05E2D0C64 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786408510; cv=none; b=WcpOfRP7+fhPBsZCJa5NK1v3VMUQhOu57h5N0LUlkmvKLfPY9k1IoFKy8OcZejl2qkRLod4WjRRgZxxIC/lC5zVAhSH1K8BoaqoNUTa0wUSxJ9z/ydWou+8wy+mfLBZezxvE85xmNWS/BOXv3jLS67U1gdFvLoKwTCQ5nNrzG/8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786408510; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZDZfHQr70nN2jCvZ/WWWxYohJj6wqGTqrH27hjFpFDA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=h90Gw+W+hTGQ7zhAwzxfdgJyK85VPqiOoNiqT6eGDh4iWRcHPZP66AnQHg1SThNu8jYgRwB7R/h/wEuDNnVD2lCpKfjkL6+n+/P7vOzcHgl96C9QjLAcl2EwikG5yEdSfXhCf57SGKenMfCCXiGWifJa11nNDMHno81MNY9jgU4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jbgjsiMO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jbgjsiMO" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50A481F000E9; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:35:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786408509; bh=qX+Z3J+a9EMRoUqDArlSMfMBOKh39R8ZSIKLpQJ8lDM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=jbgjsiMOi5pOidgwy+Z6771wvNiHF6R97tlkpw6U9Tqo/RInXyWK6i1hh6NkDCrpv YrI7/mFv5ccib+hIYH9JrW0GnVOtxbJyH60LURLC7Ebcg2V8D3roFrJjuRjC9waglF O+7bNYu2UltiD4WFRUpXfy47bFWjoc0V2AsMFVj0LuZjZbJuJgUdVUPyYLFt8OIXkY Llp4sS++XEjaZqMHqpRcx1tKInkJQJJPBPQcDEoev9LGYzuXN6sAOYLLNdunFxLoDV jqgTHDYJNTiDktKelGMTInr2b9btXDDuFFVKgG/KBx0CDFYIHBD+i7uAM8a4SfAWOM wRhuQUmd4EUsQ== Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 17:35:08 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Tony Nguyen Cc: davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2026-08-05 (ice, i40e, igc, e1000e) Message-ID: <20260810173508.4bec8799@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260805213541.2281287-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> References: <20260805213541.2281287-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 5 Aug 2026 14:35:25 -0700 Tony Nguyen wrote: > Subject: [PATCH net-next 00/15][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2026-08-05 (ice, i40e, igc, e1000e) I only looked at the High severity sashiko reports, they look legit. Please consider splitting your PRs by driver, the i40e patches are likely okay. You can have multiple PRs pending for net-next, as long as sum of all their patches isn't >15.