From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9274B4908A7 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 19:07:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786734472; cv=none; b=QrMncH8fVEs72KNgx4S00y20xHbPuVzdK0yR3SoYBpJ8vPKexPm9I4Fv1MDLJItt2gsgMLlCMeAwXABG6cg+DaddwCjaP0U8eAgW2HqUL+2zgV5nDbSv6UE1ZJG2KVipH2opn4wCTyfljgo4LhbQzBkfabOW+M9WQg7tVeBGZsI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786734472; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yG6PINZP6Ukmeh+3L91it9S/hmyQG5jrbvbrLs8jwbU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VQuJPdjH3Mf5g+4CeyD8arndH9zSyc5gw1rSpL2LKetdtb6upzul1tPdN9KE0BuwF876KpUgw4nzQu3OWAXvuJztHwrtBU/0KkNSZKwi66d6EDu4rPV+yq9pxCfFL+xUAH7HQZbvvjtXDI5BV1rB2OjuzqrQ82No60jk+vnn36c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=CHKJhxOs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="CHKJhxOs" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D690F1F000E9; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 19:07:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786734471; bh=g3c/CEufHDsTOQBuJ5Qb4sAvxxqsFDZ2uVW1zrMkSz4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=CHKJhxOsn5bWxzyPLSdMTFtJ3gaeCbM1IUYxttQYiLSd/WjnJPJBjfCZg4ir7GHSx F885rL+j/eRVzFKPUaLUljVHkeIT2UE5qITpAHvqhT/EdOc8qUQ1V5NNKJjGOC1Qve uvZp9tnJ1GpZEq7i3JOudubAqddD4kCIXnVD1OqmgW47Y/xF6nnVNbbwOcTCZ/msMq AeLVAVd9a8ey1X6mCltg8nKif3V2O4pBXdCZeT5bhaziUv+AXCD60QKruRXBmx0f4X +coU3fQ+JNpWIaTKZVE02rMLnyLWJP6WOQdVmEjbjMdwfUSozgpWBJMGRW0f9PgFbh 6cEjLvh9hyYpA== Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:07:50 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Hangbin Liu Cc: Matthieu Baerts , Paolo Abeni , Jakub Raczynski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Simon Horman , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] docs: netdev: clarify expected interactions with LLMs Message-ID: <20260814120750.420d75d1@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <83360de7addb13a3b5f4d5e722148f248fdb2ae0.1784884817.git.pabeni@redhat.com> <68b50e02-c238-48c6-b2aa-98eb21077329@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 20:47:31 +0800 Hangbin Liu wrote: > I think the ideal way is for the result to be subscribed to. It'd be ideal if y'all run the LLMs locally before sending the patches.. I understand that it's not always possible, but let's be clear on what the priorities are - as you say netdev@ is already too busy, we don't want the buggy submissions in the first place, _ideally_.