From: Baul Lee <baul.lee@xbow.com>
To: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
idosch@nvidia.com
Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, federico.kirschbaum@xbow.com
Subject: [PATCH net] ipv4: Fix in_device refcount resurrection in in_dev_get()
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 02:20:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260815172032.79740-1-baul.lee@xbow.com> (raw)
in_dev_get() reads dev->ip_ptr under RCU and then unconditionally
increments its refcount. inetdev_destroy() clears the pointer and drops
the last reference under RTNL, with no grace period in between, so a
reader that fetched the pointer before the store can increment a
refcount that has already reached zero. That resurrects an object whose
RCU free is queued: dropping the resurrected reference re-enters
in_dev_finish_destroy() for a second netdev_put() and a second
call_rcu() on the same rcu_head, and if the grace period elapses first
the drop itself is a use-after-free.
inet_netconf_get_devconf() is registered RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_UNLOCKED, and
rtnetlink_rcv_msg() exempts RTNL_KIND_GET from the CAP_NET_ADMIN check,
so an unprivileged user can drive the reader side. Reproduced as UID
65534 on v7.2-rc7:
refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
WARNING: lib/refcount.c:25 at refcount_warn_saturate+0x14c/0x180
CPU: 0 UID: 65534 PID: 655 Comm: j1_poc
refcount_warn_saturate+0x14c/0x180 (P)
inet_netconf_get_devconf+0x4b0/0x4c4
rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x434/0x4d0
followed by the matching underflow when the reference is dropped.
Use refcount_inc_not_zero() and return NULL for an in_device that has
already reached zero. All callers already handle a NULL return, which
in_dev_get() gives today whenever dev->ip_ptr is NULL. Callers under
RTNL see no change: ip_ptr is cleared before the last put, so a non-NULL
ip_ptr there implies a non-zero refcount.
Discovered by XBOW, triaged by Baul Lee <baul.lee@xbow.com>
Fixes: bbcf91053bb6 ("inet: do not use RTNL in inet_netconf_get_devconf()")
Signed-off-by: Baul Lee <baul.lee@xbow.com>
---
include/linux/inetdevice.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/inetdevice.h b/include/linux/inetdevice.h
index 6032eea2539a..a1446da64200 100644
--- a/include/linux/inetdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/inetdevice.h
@@ -245,8 +245,8 @@ static inline struct in_device *in_dev_get(const struct net_device *dev)
rcu_read_lock();
in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(dev);
- if (in_dev)
- refcount_inc(&in_dev->refcnt);
+ if (in_dev && !refcount_inc_not_zero(&in_dev->refcnt))
+ in_dev = NULL;
rcu_read_unlock();
return in_dev;
}
--
2.50.1
reply other threads:[~2026-08-15 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260815172032.79740-1-baul.lee@xbow.com \
--to=baul.lee@xbow.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=federico.kirschbaum@xbow.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox