From: Jianhui Xu <neuromoments@gmail.com>
To: mail@birger-koblitz.de
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, andrew@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
neuromoments@gmail.com, pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/14] ax88179_178a: Add support for AX88179A-based chips
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:09:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260816070954.3440027-1-neuromoments@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810-ax88179a-v7-0-da633191c129@birger-koblitz.de>
Hi Birger,
I tested v7 on the same ASIX AX88179B adapter. The 14 patches applied
cleanly to net-next commit df13c1df8147675470213ffff29dd5762fa321f5 and
built as 7.2.0-rc3-ax88179b-v7. Full and focused W=1 builds for phylink.o,
ax88179.o, and ax88796b.o completed without warnings or errors.
The main functional tests passed: cold DHCP at 1000baseT/Full, the
1000/100/10/1000 Mbit/s matrix, EEE and pause disable/restore, EEPROM read,
module reload, and QEMU USB detach/reattach. I also ran 30 additional
100baseT/Full -> 1000baseT/Full cycles; all points passed carrier,
negotiated speed, bound traffic, and RX-growth checks. Including the normal
matrix, all 31 tested 100baseT/Full points passed, so I did not reproduce
the v6 intermittent 100-Mbit carrier-without-RX issue.
However, suspend/resume with magic-packet wake failed reproducibly.
A deep-S3 cycle with `wol d` passed, but two independent fresh cycles with
`wol g` both resumed with the AX88179B interface stuck NO-CARRIER. Bound
traffic failed, neighbors remained unresolved, and RX did not increase
during immediate, 10-second, or 20-second checks.
In both failures, dmesg showed the USB reset followed by `Link is Down` and
`Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full` only about 11-13 ms apart, both before `PM:
suspend exit`. No later link event arrived after resume. By comparison, all
six retained v6 `wol g` trials passed, with Link Up occurring about 2.4-2.8
seconds after `PM: suspend exit`, when the link was actually usable.
I then tested a small ordering change in ax88179a_resume():
diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/ax88179a_devices.c b/drivers/net/usb/ax88179a_devices.c
index 6b57111a0..dc101902b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/ax88179a_devices.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/ax88179a_devices.c
@@ -215,14 +215,14 @@ static int ax88179a_resume(struct usb_interface *intf)
ax88179_write_cmd(dev, AX88179A_PHY_POWER, 0, 0, 1, ®8);
msleep(250);
+ ax88179a_reset(dev);
+
if (netif_running(dev->net)) {
rtnl_lock();
phylink_resume(ax179_data->phylink);
rtnl_unlock();
}
- ax88179a_reset(dev);
-
ax88179_set_pm_mode(dev, false);
return usbnet_resume(intf);
The modified v7 passed all the aforementioned tests, plus 13 additional
`wol g` deep-S3 cycles. Every cycle resumed at 1000baseT/Full and passed
immediate, 10-second, and 20-second traffic/RX checks. All 13 `wol g`
traces contained a usable Link Up 2.017-4.020 seconds after `PM: suspend
exit`.
I'm not an expert in the Linux networking subsystem, so I'd appreciate it
if you could take another look at whether this ordering is appropriate.
Thanks,
Jianhui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-16 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 12:33 [PATCH net-next v7 00/14] ax88179_178a: Add support for AX88179A-based chips Birger Koblitz
2026-08-10 12:33 ` [PATCH net-next v7 01/14] phylink: Add phylink_mac_interrupt Birger Koblitz
2026-08-10 12:33 ` [PATCH net-next v7 02/14] ax88179_178a: Fix endianness of pause watermark register Birger Koblitz
2026-08-10 12:33 ` [PATCH net-next v7 03/14] ax88179_178a: Split driver into library and device specific code Birger Koblitz
2026-08-10 12:33 ` [PATCH net-next v7 04/14] ax88179_178a: Add netdev2data() convenience function Birger Koblitz
2026-08-10 12:33 ` [PATCH net-next v7 05/14] ax88179_178a: Add HW support for AX179A-based chips Birger Koblitz
2026-08-10 12:33 ` [PATCH net-next v7 06/14] ax88179_178a: Add EEE configuration support for AX88179A MACs Birger Koblitz
2026-08-10 12:33 ` [PATCH net-next v7 07/14] ax88179_178a: Add EEE configuration support for AX88179A PHYs Birger Koblitz
2026-08-10 12:33 ` [PATCH net-next v7 08/14] ax88179_178a: Add VLAN offload support for AX88179A Birger Koblitz
2026-08-10 12:33 ` [PATCH net-next v7 09/14] ax88179_178a: Add AX179A/AX279 multicast configuration Birger Koblitz
2026-08-10 12:33 ` [PATCH net-next v7 10/14] ax88179_178a: Add Suspend/resume support for AX88179A/772D/279 Birger Koblitz
2026-08-10 12:33 ` [PATCH net-next v7 11/14] ax88179_178a: Add ethtool get_drvinfo Birger Koblitz
2026-08-10 12:33 ` [PATCH net-next v7 12/14] ax88179_178a: Update driver name and information Birger Koblitz
2026-08-10 12:33 ` [PATCH net-next v7 13/14] ax88179_178a: Add support for AX88179A/772D/279 EEPROM access Birger Koblitz
2026-08-10 12:33 ` [PATCH net-next v7 14/14] ax88796b: Add support for AX88772D, AX88179A and AX88279 Birger Koblitz
2026-08-16 7:09 ` Jianhui Xu [this message]
2026-08-16 7:43 ` [PATCH v7 0/14] ax88179_178a: Add support for AX88179A-based chips Birger Koblitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260816070954.3440027-1-neuromoments@gmail.com \
--to=neuromoments@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mail@birger-koblitz.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox