From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: jiawenwu@trustnetic.com
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, mengyuanlou@net-swift.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, larysa.zaremba@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: txgbe: fix interrupt mask for MISC cause in non-MSI-X mode
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:58:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260817205809.3620094-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59215DA27859BC49+20260813073305.360251-1-jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
net: txgbe: fix interrupt mask for MISC cause in non-MSI-X mode
The patch changes the trailing unmask in txgbe_misc_irq_thread_fn() so that
it uses BIT(0) instead of TXGBE_INTR_MISC(wx) when MSI-X is not enabled,
because the hardware merges all interrupt causes into BIT(0) in MSI/INTx
mode. This is meant to avoid delaying subsequent MISC interrupts until NAPI
polling completes.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_irq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_irq.c
> index 8746318ad3bcb..05b318f4e6ed6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_irq.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -183,7 +184,8 @@ static irqreturn_t txgbe_misc_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *data)
> nhandled++;
> }
>
> - wx_intr_enable(wx, TXGBE_INTR_MISC(wx));
> + misc_mask = wx->pdev->msix_enabled ? TXGBE_INTR_MISC(wx) : BIT(0);
> + wx_intr_enable(wx, misc_mask);
> return (nhandled > 0 ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE);
> }
[Severity: Medium]
Should this unmask be guarded by WX_STATE_DOWN now that it touches the live
BIT(0) cause?
In non-MSI-X mode this write becomes a real WX_PX_IMC(0) = BIT(0), which
re-arms the single merged queue+MISC cause. Before the change the value was
BIT(wx->num_q_vectors) = BIT(1) with num_q_vectors == 1 in this mode, i.e. a
bit the hardware does not use here, so the write left no hardware residue.
wx_irq_disable() in libwx/wx_hw.c masks everything before it waits for
in-flight handlers:
void wx_irq_disable(struct wx *wx)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = wx->pdev;
wr32(wx, WX_PX_MISC_IEN, 0);
wx_intr_disable(wx, WX_INTR_ALL);
if (pdev->msix_enabled) {
...
} else {
synchronize_irq(pdev->irq);
}
}
Can a misc thread that is already running execute its trailing
wx_intr_enable(wx, BIT(0)) after those mask writes, so that synchronize_irq()
returns with the only active cause unmasked while the driver considers
interrupts off?
The window in txgbe_disable_device() spans wx_irq_disable() through
wx_napi_disable_all(), timer_delete_sync(), cancel_work_sync() and the TX ring
shutdown, and the mask is only restored later via txgbe_reset() ->
txgbe_reset_hw() -> wx_stop_adapter(). Since the TX rings and TX DMA engine
are stopped after wx_irq_disable(), a TX completion cause could assert on the
re-unmasked BIT(0) during that window; on a shared INTx line the hard handler
then takes the eicr == 0 path, returns IRQ_NONE and does not write
WX_PX_INTA.
Every other unmask site in this driver family wraps the same operation in the
down check, for example wx_poll() in libwx/wx_lib.c:
if (!test_bit(WX_STATE_DOWN, wx->state))
wx_intr_enable(wx, WX_INTR_Q(q_vector->v_idx));
and ngbe_intr() in ngbe/ngbe_main.c:
if (!test_bit(WX_STATE_DOWN, wx->state))
ngbe_irq_enable(wx, false);
txgbe_misc_irq_handle() itself uses the guard on its shared interrupt path.
Would something like the following be more consistent?
misc_mask = wx->pdev->msix_enabled ? TXGBE_INTR_MISC(wx) : BIT(0);
if (!test_bit(WX_STATE_DOWN, wx->state))
wx_intr_enable(wx, misc_mask);
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 7:33 [PATCH net] net: txgbe: fix interrupt mask for MISC cause in non-MSI-X mode Jiawen Wu
2026-08-14 17:13 ` Simon Horman
2026-08-17 20:58 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-08-18 1:46 ` Jiawen Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260817205809.3620094-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jiawenwu@trustnetic.com \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=mengyuanlou@net-swift.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox