From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: fy15309206903@gmail.com
Cc: Mika Westerberg <westeri@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: thunderbolt: Count delivered packets in rx_packets and rx_bytes
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 20:03:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260818190326.GI265046@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260815-tbnet-rx-stats-v1-1-8da375c2cd09@gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 10:21:52AM +0000, Fan Ye via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Fan Ye <fy15309206903@gmail.com>
>
> tbnet_poll() increments rx_packets once per received frame because that is
> the NAPI work unit, and then adds the same number to stats.rx_packets. An
> skb is handed to the stack only when the last frame of a packet arrives,
> so once the MTU exceeds TBNET_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE the statistic reports
> frames. tx_packets is bumped once per skb, so the two ends of a link
> disagree: at MTU 65330 the receiver reports 16 times the packets its
> sender sent.
>
> rx_bytes has the matching problem: frames of a packet that is later
> dropped mid-assembly are already accounted, so it does not correspond to
> rx_packets as documented. Account for both where the packet is completed,
> and leave the NAPI work counter alone.
>
> Fixes: e69b6c02b4c3 ("net: Add support for networking over Thunderbolt cable")
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
> Signed-off-by: Fan Ye <fy15309206903@gmail.com>
> ---
> Seen at MTU 65330 on an ASM4242 host-to-host link, where a packet is 16
> frames. On the receiver rx_bytes/rx_packets came out at 4083.9, i.e.
> TBNET_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE, and rx_packets ran 15.9x the IP layer's InReceives;
> with the patch they are 65308.3 and 0.99. At the default MTU a packet fits
> in one frame and the counters already agree, which is why this went
> unnoticed.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-15 10:21 [PATCH net] net: thunderbolt: Count delivered packets in rx_packets and rx_bytes Fan Ye via B4 Relay
2026-08-18 19:03 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-08-19 6:08 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260818190326.GI265046@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fy15309206903@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=westeri@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox