From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: hexlabsecurity@proton.me
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
wintera@linux.ibm.com, twinkler@linux.ibm.com,
hidayath@linux.ibm.com, horms@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ursula.braun@de.ibm.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/iucv: reconcile the socket state when connect() severs the path
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 12:37:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260820193752.1074271-2-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260815-b4-disp-e1faf4b7-v1-1-2a8a143a0055@proton.me>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
net/iucv: reconcile the socket state when connect() severs the path
When a classic AF_IUCV connect() fails and severs the path, the socket
could be left in IUCV_CONNECTED with iucv->path already NULL. The patch
adds a state reconciliation to IUCV_DISCONN right after iucv_sever_path()
so that a later sendmsg() does not walk the NULL path pointer.
> diff --git a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
> index ea047bab65e7c..6fb0041c4c987 100644
> --- a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
> +++ b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
> @@ -778,8 +778,16 @@ static int iucv_sock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *addr,
> if (sk->sk_state == IUCV_DISCONN || sk->sk_state == IUCV_CLOSED)
> err = -ECONNREFUSED;
>
> - if (err && iucv->transport == AF_IUCV_TRANS_IUCV)
> + if (err && iucv->transport == AF_IUCV_TRANS_IUCV) {
> iucv_sever_path(sk, 0);
> + /* A connack may have landed while the wait was unwinding; the
> + * path is gone, so the socket must not still claim it.
> + */
> + if (sk->sk_state == IUCV_CONNECTED) {
> + sk->sk_state = IUCV_DISCONN;
> + sk->sk_state_change(sk);
> + }
> + }
[Severity: Critical]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but it should probably be
fixed at the same time. Does the same CONNECTED-with-NULL-path state
remain reachable from the HiperSockets receive path, so that the NULL
dereference described in the changelog survives?
afiucv_hs_rcv() matches sockets on the global iucv_sk_list by name only:
net/iucv/af_iucv.c:afiucv_hs_rcv() {
...
sk_for_each(sk, &iucv_sk_list.head) {
if (trans_hdr->flags == AF_IUCV_FLAG_SYN) {
...
} else {
if ((!memcmp(&iucv_sk(sk)->src_name,
trans_hdr->destAppName, 8)) &&
...
(!memcmp(&iucv_sk(sk)->dst_user_id,
trans_hdr->srcUserID, 8))) {
iucv = iucv_sk(sk);
break;
...
}
There is no check of iucv->transport, no check of iucv->hs_dev and no
network namespace check, and iucv_packet_type is registered globally in
afiucv_init() with dev_add_pack(&iucv_packet_type) and no .dev filter.
afiucv_hs_callback_synack() then only requires IUCV_BOUND before writing
the connected state:
net/iucv/af_iucv.c:afiucv_hs_callback_synack() {
if (!iucv || sk->sk_state != IUCV_BOUND) {
kfree_skb(skb);
return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
}
bh_lock_sock(sk);
iucv->msglimit_peer = iucv_trans_hdr(skb)->window;
sk->sk_state = IUCV_CONNECTED;
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
...
}
So a classic-transport socket that has only been bound, or one whose
connect() failed with the wait timing out or being interrupted (path
severed to NULL, state left at IUCV_BOUND, which the new code does not
reconcile), can end up at IUCV_CONNECTED with iucv->path == NULL.
Once that happens, iucv_below_msglim() dereferences the NULL path:
net/iucv/af_iucv.c:iucv_below_msglim() {
if (sk->sk_state != IUCV_CONNECTED)
return 1;
if (iucv->transport == AF_IUCV_TRANS_IUCV)
return (atomic_read(&iucv->skbs_in_xmit) < iucv->path->msglim);
...
}
and it is called from iucv_sock_poll():
if (sock_writeable(sk) && iucv_below_msglim(sk))
which the sk_state_change() above has just woken, as well as from
iucv_sock_sendmsg() via iucv_sock_wait(sk, iucv_below_msglim(sk), timeo).
iucv_sock_sendmsg() also reads iucv->path->flags:
if (((iucv->path->flags & IUCV_IPRMDATA) & iucv->flags) &&
and passes iucv->path to pr_iucv->message_send().
The changelog says:
The sever is a barrier against a later connack: iucv_path_sever()
clears the path from iucv_path_table[] under the lock the tasklet
holds across dispatch.
Is that statement complete? It holds for the classic iucv tasklet, where
iucv_tasklet_fn() holds iucv_table_lock across dispatch, but the
HiperSockets callbacks run from the netdev RX softirq under
bh_lock_sock() only, and are not excluded by iucv_table_lock.
Would it make sense to also check iucv->transport (and iucv->hs_dev)
in the afiucv_hs_rcv() socket lookup or in afiucv_hs_callback_synack(),
and/or to have iucv_below_msglim() and iucv_sock_sendmsg() test
iucv->path before dereferencing it?
--
pw-bot: cr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-20 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-15 15:43 [PATCH net] net/iucv: reconcile the socket state when connect() severs the path Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-08-20 19:37 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260820193752.1074271-2-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
--cc=hidayath@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=twinkler@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ursula.braun@de.ibm.com \
--cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox