From: luoqing <l1138897701@163.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Jing Min Zhao <zhaojignmin@hotmail.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] netfilter: nf_conntrack_h323: fix double cursor advance in decode_int()
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 14:52:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821065229.121871-1-l1138897701@163.com> (raw)
From: Qing Luo <luoqing@kylinos.cn>
In the CONS case of decode_int(), when the field is actually decoded
(base is not NULL and the field carries the DECODE attribute),
get_uint() already advances the bitstream cursor by 'len' bytes. The
subsequent unconditional "bs->cur += len" then advances the cursor a
second time over the same data, so the parser skips 'len' extra bytes.
All fields following such an integer are decoded from a wrong bit
position. This affects the timeToLive field in RAS
RegistrationRequest/RegistrationConfirm messages: subsequent fields
(e.g. transport addresses) end up being parsed from arbitrary offsets
inside the message, so the helper may create expectations based on
bogus addresses/ports.
Only advance the cursor manually when get_uint() was not called, so
that the value bytes are consumed exactly once in either case.
Fixes: 5e35941d9901 ("[NETFILTER]: Add H.323 conntrack/NAT helper")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Qing Luo <luoqing@kylinos.cn>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_h323_asn1.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_h323_asn1.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_h323_asn1.c
index 6830c9da3507..a51275cc4d0f 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_h323_asn1.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_h323_asn1.c
@@ -336,8 +336,9 @@ static int decode_int(struct bitstr *bs, const struct field_t *f,
unsigned int v = get_uint(bs, len) + f->lb;
PRINT(" = %u", v);
*((unsigned int *)(base + f->offset)) = v;
+ } else {
+ bs->cur += len;
}
- bs->cur += len;
break;
case UNCO:
BYTE_ALIGN(bs);
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 6:52 luoqing [this message]
2026-08-21 11:00 ` [PATCH net] netfilter: nf_conntrack_h323: fix double cursor advance in decode_int() Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260821065229.121871-1-l1138897701@163.com \
--to=l1138897701@163.com \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=zhaojignmin@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox