Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junwoong Doh <jdoh.kernel@gmail.com>
To: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Junwoong Doh <jdoh.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] nfc: llcp: fix NULL pointer dereference race in nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame()
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 19:32:44 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821103244.72313-1-jdoh.kernel@gmail.com> (raw)

nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame() checks whether sock->local is NULL, but it is
called by llcp_sock_sendmsg() without the socket lock held, which opens
a window for a race condition. Between the sock->local check and the
sock->dev use in nfc_alloc_send_skb(), llcp_sock_bind() can run
concurrently and set both sock->local and sock->dev to NULL, which can
lead to a NULL pointer dereference in nfc_alloc_send_skb().

Take a reference to sock->local under the socket lock and pass it to
nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(), which now uses the pinned local->dev instead
of re-reading sock->dev. nfc_llcp_local_get() also pins the nfc_dev, so
both stay valid against a concurrent llcp_sock_bind().

Fixes: dded08927ca3 ("nfc: llcp: fix NULL error pointer dereference on sendmsg() after failed bind()")
Signed-off-by: Junwoong Doh <jdoh.kernel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/a89d0419-8bcf-40a2-b52d-3e5d911f11da@gmail.com/
---
v2:
  - Changed locking to refcounting to avoid holding the socket lock
    across the blocking send.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260725115556.1250160-1-jdoh.kernel@gmail.com/

 net/nfc/llcp.h          |  4 +++-
 net/nfc/llcp_commands.c | 10 +++-------
 net/nfc/llcp_core.c     |  2 +-
 net/nfc/llcp_sock.c     | 10 ++++++++--
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp.h b/net/nfc/llcp.h
index d8345ed57c95..3ff9729daf63 100644
--- a/net/nfc/llcp.h
+++ b/net/nfc/llcp.h
@@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ void nfc_llcp_sock_link(struct llcp_sock_list *l, struct sock *s);
 void nfc_llcp_sock_unlink(struct llcp_sock_list *l, struct sock *s);
 void nfc_llcp_socket_remote_param_init(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock);
 struct nfc_llcp_local *nfc_llcp_find_local(struct nfc_dev *dev);
+struct nfc_llcp_local *nfc_llcp_local_get(struct nfc_llcp_local *local);
 int nfc_llcp_local_put(struct nfc_llcp_local *local);
 u8 nfc_llcp_get_sdp_ssap(struct nfc_llcp_local *local,
 			 struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock);
@@ -243,7 +244,8 @@ int nfc_llcp_send_dm(struct nfc_llcp_local *local, u8 ssap, u8 dsap, u8 reason);
 int nfc_llcp_send_disconnect(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock);
 int nfc_llcp_send_i_frame(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock,
 			  struct msghdr *msg, size_t len);
-int nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock, u8 ssap, u8 dsap,
+int nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock,
+			   struct nfc_llcp_local *local, u8 ssap, u8 dsap,
 			   struct msghdr *msg, size_t len);
 int nfc_llcp_send_rr(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock);
 
diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp_commands.c b/net/nfc/llcp_commands.c
index ca89fe967d6a..1549ed2631f5 100644
--- a/net/nfc/llcp_commands.c
+++ b/net/nfc/llcp_commands.c
@@ -740,11 +740,11 @@ int nfc_llcp_send_i_frame(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock,
 	return len;
 }
 
-int nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock, u8 ssap, u8 dsap,
+int nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock,
+			   struct nfc_llcp_local *local, u8 ssap, u8 dsap,
 			   struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *pdu;
-	struct nfc_llcp_local *local;
 	size_t frag_len = 0, remaining_len;
 	u8 *msg_ptr, *msg_data;
 	u16 remote_miu;
@@ -752,10 +752,6 @@ int nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock, u8 ssap, u8 dsap,
 
 	pr_debug("Send UI frame len %zd\n", len);
 
-	local = sock->local;
-	if (local == NULL)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
 	msg_data = kmalloc(len, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
 	if (msg_data == NULL)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -777,7 +773,7 @@ int nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock, u8 ssap, u8 dsap,
 		pr_debug("Fragment %zd bytes remaining %zd",
 			 frag_len, remaining_len);
 
-		pdu = nfc_alloc_send_skb(sock->dev, &sock->sk, 0,
+		pdu = nfc_alloc_send_skb(local->dev, &sock->sk, 0,
 					 frag_len + LLCP_HEADER_SIZE, &err);
 		if (pdu == NULL) {
 			pr_err("Could not allocate PDU (error=%d)\n", err);
diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp_core.c b/net/nfc/llcp_core.c
index cac1b5487064..52e72399d731 100644
--- a/net/nfc/llcp_core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/llcp_core.c
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static void nfc_llcp_socket_release(struct nfc_llcp_local *local, bool device,
 	write_unlock(&local->raw_sockets.lock);
 }
 
-static struct nfc_llcp_local *nfc_llcp_local_get(struct nfc_llcp_local *local)
+struct nfc_llcp_local *nfc_llcp_local_get(struct nfc_llcp_local *local)
 {
 	/* Since using nfc_llcp_local may result in usage of nfc_dev, whenever
 	 * we hold a reference to local, we also need to hold a reference to
diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c b/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
index 5558d8a4d48b..4d38025e8213 100644
--- a/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
+++ b/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
@@ -787,6 +787,7 @@ static int llcp_sock_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 {
 	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
 	struct nfc_llcp_sock *llcp_sock = nfc_llcp_sock(sk);
+	struct nfc_llcp_local *local;
 	int ret;
 
 	pr_debug("sock %p sk %p", sock, sk);
@@ -819,10 +820,15 @@ static int llcp_sock_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
+		local = nfc_llcp_local_get(llcp_sock->local);
 		release_sock(sk);
+		if (!local)
+			return -ENODEV;
 
-		return nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(llcp_sock, addr->dsap, addr->ssap,
-					      msg, len);
+		ret = nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(llcp_sock, local, addr->dsap,
+					     addr->ssap, msg, len);
+		nfc_llcp_local_put(local);
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	if (sk->sk_state != LLCP_CONNECTED) {
-- 
2.34.1


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-08-21 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260821103244.72313-1-jdoh.kernel@gmail.com \
    --to=jdoh.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@ixit.cz \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox