From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net] ice: fix bound parser hash offset before reading packet data
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 12:08:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260824110838.GP265046@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820114314.646344-1-aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 01:43:14PM +0200, Aleksandr Loktionov wrote:
> ice_rt_ho_set() uses the HO register as the starting offset of an
> ICE_GPR_HV_SIZE-byte memcpy() out of rt->pkt_buf. Potentially HO can
> be advanced by user-controlled data reachable through
> ice_parse_raw_rss_pattern() -> ice_parser_run() ->
> ice_parser_rt_execute() -> ice_rt_gpr_set() -> ice_rt_ho_set(), i.e. a
> VF-supplied raw RSS pattern (virt/rss.c), with no bound against the
> size of pkt_buf.
>
> Clamp HO to the last offset from which ICE_GPR_HV_SIZE bytes can still
> be read out of pkt_buf, deriving the limit from sizeof(rt->pkt_buf)
> so it stays correct if the packet buffer layout changes.
>
> Fixes: 9a4c07aaa0f5 ("ice: add parser execution main loop")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_parser_rt.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_parser_rt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_parser_rt.c
> index 3995d66..bfdb50b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_parser_rt.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_parser_rt.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ static void ice_rt_tsr_set(struct ice_parser_rt *rt, u16 tsr)
>
> static void ice_rt_ho_set(struct ice_parser_rt *rt, u16 ho)
> {
> + /* keep the ICE_GPR_HV_SIZE-byte read below within pkt_buf */
> + ho = min_t(u16, ho, sizeof(rt->pkt_buf) - ICE_GPR_HV_SIZE);
> rt->gpr[ICE_GPR_HO_IDX] = ho;
> memcpy(&rt->gpr[ICE_GPR_HV_IDX], &rt->pkt_buf[ho], ICE_GPR_HV_SIZE);
> }
Hi,
There is an AI-generated review of this patch available at
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260820114314.646344-1-aleksandr.loktionov%40intel.com
The first item flagged there seems of concern
and I am wondering if you could respond to it.
Does this new clamp introduce an infinite loop?
In ice_parser_rt_execute(), the loop termination condition is:
if (rt->gpr[ICE_GPR_HO_IDX] >= rt->pkt_len) {
break;
}
If a guest VM VF submits a raw RSS pattern with a pkt_len greater than 504
bytes, ice_parser_rt_pktbuf_set() saves that unclamped length directly into
rt->pkt_len (e.g., 1024).
With this patch, the HO register is capped at 488 (sizeof(rt->pkt_buf) -
ICE_GPR_HV_SIZE). Since 488 will never be greater than or equal to 1024,
can this cause the parser to loop indefinitely if the state machine
processes a repetitive sequence?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 11:43 [PATCH iwl-net] ice: fix bound parser hash offset before reading packet data Aleksandr Loktionov
2026-08-24 11:08 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-08-24 13:18 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-08-24 15:51 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260824110838.GP265046@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox