From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: ZhilingZouzhilinz@nebusec.ai
Cc: pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org,
vega@nebusec.ai, zhilinz@nebusec.ai
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/1] ipv6: flowlabel: cap duplicate leases per socket
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 18:22:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260824152214.GA1112115@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69d00f6ba09b1d1afd9281370cf7ae5e2ce806b6.1787387550.git.zhilinz@nebusec.ai>
On Sat, Aug 22, 2026 at 04:41:42PM +0800, ZhilingZouzhilinz@nebusec.ai wrote:
> From: Zhiling Zou <zhilinz@nebusec.ai>
>
> ipv6_flowlabel_get() allocates an ipv6_fl_socklist entry for every
> successful GET. The recheck path for a compatible existing flowlabel
> links another lease without applying any lease admission check. Repeated
> GET requests for one shareable label can therefore grow a socket's lease
> list without bound.
>
> Count the socket's existing leases during the lookup and reject a new
> unprivileged lease once the count reaches FL_MAX_PER_SOCK. This matches
> mem_check()'s per-socket accounting and also covers leases acquired from
> distinct globally interned labels. The IPv6 sockopt lock serializes the
> count with fl_link() and PUT, so no global ip6_fl_lock is needed.
>
> Check CAP_NET_ADMIN only when the socket reaches the limit. This avoids a
> capability audit on successful unprivileged GET requests below the cap,
> while privileged callers remain unrestricted.
>
> Do the admission check before updating linger and expires. A rejected GET
> does not refresh the shared label, matching the existing socket-list
> allocation failure path.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Vega <vega@nebusec.ai>
> Signed-off-by: Zhiling Zou <zhilinz@nebusec.ai>
> ---
> changes in v3:
> - Count the socket's full lease list instead of only matching leases.
> - Defer the CAP_NET_ADMIN check until the lease count reaches the limit.
> - v2 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/528bc30d301bcf32aca37cda1933b617d2d295f4.1786447968.git.zhilinz@nebusec.ai/
>
> changes in v2:
> - Count only leases of the flowlabel being reused.
> - Fold the count into the existing socket-list lookup.
> - Keep new-label admission under the existing mem_check() policy.
> - Stop after the first matching lease for CAP_NET_ADMIN callers.
> - Explain why a rejected GET does not refresh linger or expires.
> - Correct the reuse-path explanation and trim the Fixes hash.
> - v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cf4fdc79ae4dc46bd4eb7eeb57e5de2091c13cd3.1785746178.git.zhilinz@nebusec.ai/
>
> net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
> index 1ab5ad0dcf24f..b864dfc87f779 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
> @@ -617,6 +617,7 @@ static int ipv6_flowlabel_get(struct sock *sk, struct in6_flowlabel_req *freq,
> struct ipv6_fl_socklist *sfl, *sfl1 = NULL;
> struct ip6_flowlabel *fl, *fl1 = NULL;
> struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
> + int lease_count = 0;
> int err;
>
> if (freq->flr_flags & IPV6_FL_F_REFLECT) {
> @@ -647,16 +648,20 @@ static int ipv6_flowlabel_get(struct sock *sk, struct in6_flowlabel_req *freq,
> err = -EEXIST;
> rcu_read_lock();
> for_each_sk_fl_rcu(sk, sfl) {
> + lease_count++;
> if (sfl->fl->label == freq->flr_label) {
> if (freq->flr_flags & IPV6_FL_F_EXCL) {
> rcu_read_unlock();
> goto done;
> }
> - fl1 = sfl->fl;
> - if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&fl1->users))
> - fl1 = NULL;
> - break;
> + if (!fl1) {
> + fl1 = sfl->fl;
> + if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&fl1->users))
> + fl1 = NULL;
> + }
> }
> + if (fl1 && lease_count >= FL_MAX_PER_SOCK)
> + break;
I find this hunk confusing. What do we gain from it? Unpriv users can
still walk the entire list in case of a miss. Also, we can get to the
recheck label from the fl_intern() path which is outside of this block.
How about something like [1]?
Also, please mention in the commit message that capable() is used
instead of ns_capable() in order to be consistent with mem_check() and
because we want to prevent unpriv users from consuming the host's memory
by creating a user ns and a netns where they have CAP_NET_ADMIN.
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> @@ -679,6 +684,11 @@ static int ipv6_flowlabel_get(struct sock *sk, struct in6_flowlabel_req *freq,
> err = -ENOMEM;
> if (!sfl1)
> goto release;
> + /* sockopt_lock_sock() serializes the count and fl_link(). */
> + err = -ENOBUFS;
> + if (lease_count >= FL_MAX_PER_SOCK &&
> + !capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
> + goto release;
> if (fl->linger > fl1->linger)
> fl1->linger = fl->linger;
> if ((long)(fl->expires - fl1->expires) > 0)
[1]
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
index 1ab5ad0dcf24..006585dc8b5c 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
@@ -461,6 +461,21 @@ fl_create(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct in6_flowlabel_req *freq,
return NULL;
}
+static bool fl_sock_at_lease_limit(const struct sock *sk)
+{
+ const struct ipv6_fl_socklist *sfl;
+ int count = 0;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ for_each_sk_fl_rcu(sk, sfl) {
+ if (++count >= FL_MAX_PER_SOCK)
+ break;
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return count >= FL_MAX_PER_SOCK;
+}
+
static int mem_check(struct sock *sk)
{
const int unpriv_total_limit = FL_MAX_SIZE - (FL_MAX_SIZE / 4);
@@ -679,6 +694,10 @@ static int ipv6_flowlabel_get(struct sock *sk, struct in6_flowlabel_req *freq,
err = -ENOMEM;
if (!sfl1)
goto release;
+ err = -ENOBUFS;
+ if (fl_sock_at_lease_limit(sk) &&
+ !capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
+ goto release;
if (fl->linger > fl1->linger)
fl1->linger = fl->linger;
if ((long)(fl->expires - fl1->expires) > 0)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-22 8:41 [PATCH net v3 0/1] ipv6: flowlabel: cap duplicate leases per socket Zhiling
2026-08-22 8:41 ` [PATCH net v3 1/1] " Zhiling
2026-08-24 15:22 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260824152214.GA1112115@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=ZhilingZouzhilinz@nebusec.ai \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vega@nebusec.ai \
--cc=zhilinz@nebusec.ai \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox