Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cen Zhang (Microsoft)" <blbllhy@gmail.com>
To: ap420073@gmail.com
Cc: AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	blbllhy@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	horms@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, kys@microsoft.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, tgopinath@linux.microsoft.com, xmei5@asu.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] amt: do not store tunnel pointer in skb control block
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:15:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826041529.46139-1-blbllhy@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMArcTUmACRn_h2sthPwsi3jYjKWRM6+Pnhg=tN4jn4VZThHCA@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks for the feedback. Just getting back to this thread.

On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 10:18:43PM +0900, Taehee Yoo wrote:
> This looks like it adds a per-packet linear scan over all tunnels,
> so I'm concerned about performance when there are many tunnels.
> Do you have any idea how to avoid this regression?

I see two possible approaches:

1. Keep the v1 implementation. It is the simplest fix, but changes the
   Query dequeue path from an O(1) pointer access to an O(n) lookup. I am
   not sure whether that cost is significant in practice for two reasons:
   this handles IGMP/MLD Query control packets rather than multicast data
   packets [1], while the hotter multicast data path already walks
   tunnel_list for each skb [2]; and max_tunnels defaults to 128. However,
   max_tunnels is configurable, so users can set it much higher.

2. Add a small per-device bucket hash keyed by (ip4, source_port) to [1],
   while keeping tunnel_list for multicast fan-out in [2]. This avoids
   a new linear lookup cost, but adds a second index that must be
   maintained during tunnel creation, expiry, and device teardown.
   I am not sure whether that is overkill for this fix.

I would appreciate your further feedback here and will prepare v2 after
settling on the approach.

> I think this comment is not necessary. Please remove it.

Agreed. I will remove it in v2.

[1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/0f23d56f17fdfc7db69d51f64c8b91bbab947aa9/drivers/net/amt.c#L1261
[2] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/0f23d56f17fdfc7db69d51f64c8b91bbab947aa9/drivers/net/amt.c#L1276

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-26  4:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-18 16:48 [PATCH net] amt: do not store tunnel pointer in skb control block Cen Zhang (Microsoft)
2026-08-20 13:18 ` Taehee Yoo
2026-08-26  4:15   ` Cen Zhang (Microsoft) [this message]
2026-08-26 12:56     ` Taehee Yoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260826041529.46139-1-blbllhy@gmail.com \
    --to=blbllhy@gmail.com \
    --cc=AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tgopinath@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=xmei5@asu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox