From: "Cen Zhang (Microsoft)" <blbllhy@gmail.com>
To: ap420073@gmail.com
Cc: AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
blbllhy@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
horms@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, kys@microsoft.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, tgopinath@linux.microsoft.com, xmei5@asu.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] amt: do not store tunnel pointer in skb control block
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:15:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826041529.46139-1-blbllhy@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMArcTUmACRn_h2sthPwsi3jYjKWRM6+Pnhg=tN4jn4VZThHCA@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the feedback. Just getting back to this thread.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 10:18:43PM +0900, Taehee Yoo wrote:
> This looks like it adds a per-packet linear scan over all tunnels,
> so I'm concerned about performance when there are many tunnels.
> Do you have any idea how to avoid this regression?
I see two possible approaches:
1. Keep the v1 implementation. It is the simplest fix, but changes the
Query dequeue path from an O(1) pointer access to an O(n) lookup. I am
not sure whether that cost is significant in practice for two reasons:
this handles IGMP/MLD Query control packets rather than multicast data
packets [1], while the hotter multicast data path already walks
tunnel_list for each skb [2]; and max_tunnels defaults to 128. However,
max_tunnels is configurable, so users can set it much higher.
2. Add a small per-device bucket hash keyed by (ip4, source_port) to [1],
while keeping tunnel_list for multicast fan-out in [2]. This avoids
a new linear lookup cost, but adds a second index that must be
maintained during tunnel creation, expiry, and device teardown.
I am not sure whether that is overkill for this fix.
I would appreciate your further feedback here and will prepare v2 after
settling on the approach.
> I think this comment is not necessary. Please remove it.
Agreed. I will remove it in v2.
[1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/0f23d56f17fdfc7db69d51f64c8b91bbab947aa9/drivers/net/amt.c#L1261
[2] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/0f23d56f17fdfc7db69d51f64c8b91bbab947aa9/drivers/net/amt.c#L1276
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-26 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 16:48 [PATCH net] amt: do not store tunnel pointer in skb control block Cen Zhang (Microsoft)
2026-08-20 13:18 ` Taehee Yoo
2026-08-26 4:15 ` Cen Zhang (Microsoft) [this message]
2026-08-26 12:56 ` Taehee Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260826041529.46139-1-blbllhy@gmail.com \
--to=blbllhy@gmail.com \
--cc=AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tgopinath@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=xmei5@asu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox