From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-43103.protonmail.ch (mail-43103.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A5E8399D0C; Fri, 28 Aug 2026 17:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.43.103 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787939913; cv=none; b=WjHuNDpG6BzGA8s1qFfaE9FmlwjOLmMUh4vbYawaBWpColZEmTEMXFzJsR7AYFtcgRLHX9A1j14BOURlUqjQDnN1Dvdfz4sPHNQzXLcDJaErQqFPfgr4FTNqBt6zA7gWKdXjXIw9YIeVWJIPnXKzo6CJwApqUwUPUguwp7oAPoE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787939913; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cdv4G1v1iPQh+uog2MJQGouCWPMjvkyzyRfo7p9D3Lw=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qRlw+496xK7HtYoBWdRuNGW+d7U1mXZHUD9gK375wiSBAiKIPAMXyAgB3Objo0pAg7awFXvJaSXwJCijiFJeZa6rK/UFj7J7Fnz4Y+/MvlrL7aaiY7Y7Bymz2KHaTw1JfgTCP6ITCvkXOt/1SZfVp0RYXn5lrKunpaDX/+q/M1w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b=XebOZkYV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.43.103 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b="XebOZkYV" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=protonmail; t=1787939904; x=1788199104; bh=cdv4G1v1iPQh+uog2MJQGouCWPMjvkyzyRfo7p9D3Lw=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=XebOZkYVtRikZ+tyW+mcs98Ef1BeA/utB0qQXkGAz3JPDTffYcXKVPQekkzIQ7bHb UckrRssIvlkYrft3thPNnopBydkaf8oQeCRZOW2MPP3Luh1rQAe3HXniPNLNwoRgWG YVzZqqUtPKaD9xyzMRlBwiR7B0El41RrJ0E25AT0NvSGRPWf7z9+Gak6jS+pryIlUB oSmYKqYwJebl7fur4/plGV1kBcRkBnpWuaq3V8ixgCUBLPmp0O7DpiMFU7Jgwbf6WJ 84N7Qf+msNOwxJ4Hqjbr0Kwi7u/epZhEUwNvNbLknsNVBeuykEJcAHfUGIuv7q8/Sf kfA/MvK7D/+XQ== Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 17:58:18 +0000 To: Alexandra Winter , David Miller , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Eric Dumazet , Andrew Lunn From: Bryam Vargas Cc: Hidayath Khan , Aswin Karuvally , Thorsten Winkler , Hendrik Brueckner , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/iucv: filter frames in afiucv_hs_rcv() by ingress device Message-ID: <20260828175803.11391-1-hexlabsecurity@proton.me> In-Reply-To: <20260821125501.3718748-1-wintera@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260821125501.3718748-1-wintera@linux.ibm.com> Feedback-ID: 199661219:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: c5ea6a74dcb098c0a4b2f7c327c483d5d58ce252 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alexandra, > Bryam, would you accept a Co-developed-by, as you did the analysis > and you proposed to add checks in afiucv_hs_rcv()? Yes. Signed-off-by: Bryam Vargas Late for the commit itself: 80230a18c164 went up in the 27 Aug pull request= and is in mainline carrying the Co-developed-by without a matching sign-off, an= d submitting-patches.rst pairs the two. Nothing to do about it there. Putting= the sign-off on the list is the record that the consent existed. I'm dropping 1/2, as I said I would, and I'm not respinning the transport-filter patch either: yours closes it, and it answers what Jakub asked for on that thread -- the device test in the same loop. He was right there. The changelog argued a reach the two-line check did not close. 2/2 is unaffected. On timing: I'm in the middle of a larger project and have only a few hours = a week for this at the moment. I'd rather say so than go quiet on the thread. Thanks, Bryam