Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ali Firas <alishmery18@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, idosch@nvidia.com,
	razor@blackwall.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ali Firas <alishmery18@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] vxlan: vnifilter: validate the VNI range in vni_filter_entry_policy
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2026 06:00:41 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260829030041.940594-1-alishmery18@gmail.com> (raw)

VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_START and VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_END are declared as
bare NLA_U32, so neither is range-checked before vxlan_process_vni_filter()
passes them to vxlan_vni_add_del():

	int v, err = 0;

	for (v = start_vni; v <= end_vni; v++) {

v is int and end_vni is __u32, so the comparison is unsigned. With
end_vni == U32_MAX the loop cannot terminate through its own condition:
v reaches U32_MAX, wraps to 0, and 0 <= U32_MAX is true again. Every
iteration allocates a vxlan_vni_node plus a per-CPU vxlan_vni_stats_pcpu
block until the machine is out of memory. Neither allocation carries
__GFP_ACCOUNT, so the memory is not charged to the caller's memory
cgroup, and the per-CPU block multiplies the cost by the number of CPUs.

The rtnl_msg_handler entry for RTM_NEWTUNNEL carries no
RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_UNLOCKED, so the loop runs holding rtnl_lock. rtnl_lock is
global rather than per-netns, so for as long as the loop runs every
network configuration operation on the host blocks, in every namespace.
There is no cond_resched() in the loop either.

The interface is reachable without privilege: creating the device and
adding VNIs only requires CAP_NET_ADMIN in the network namespace's user
namespace, so an unprivileged user inside unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER |
CLONE_NEWNET) can trigger this with a single netlink message.

A VNI at or above VXLAN_N_VID is also accepted and stored, although the
VXLAN header carries only 24 bits.

The MDB interface in the same driver already range-validates its VNI
attributes with an identical constraint (vxlan_mdb.c, vni_range with
.max = VXLAN_N_VID - 1). Apply the same validation here.

Tested under KASAN in a 2G guest: before the change, adding the range
0-U32_MAX from an unprivileged user namespace drives a global OOM with
the allocating task in vxlan_vnifilter_process(); after it, out-of-range
values are rejected and the in-range case is unaffected.

Reproducer available on request.

Fixes: f9c4bb0b245c ("vxlan: vni filtering support on collect metadata device")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-6 [claude-code]
Signed-off-by: Ali Firas <alishmery18@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
index dd94085e0886..9e86ac39cf9d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
@@ -459,9 +459,15 @@ static int vxlan_vnifilter_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb
 	return err;
 }
 
+static const struct netlink_range_validation vni_filter_vni_range = {
+	.max = VXLAN_N_VID - 1,
+};
+
 static const struct nla_policy vni_filter_entry_policy[VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_MAX + 1] = {
-	[VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_START] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
-	[VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_END] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
+	[VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_START] = NLA_POLICY_FULL_RANGE(NLA_U32,
+							      &vni_filter_vni_range),
+	[VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_END] = NLA_POLICY_FULL_RANGE(NLA_U32,
+							    &vni_filter_vni_range),
 	[VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_GROUP]	= NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof_field(struct iphdr, daddr)),
 	[VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY_GROUP6]	= NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(sizeof(struct in6_addr)),
 };
-- 
2.53.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-08-29  3:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-29  3:00 Ali Firas [this message]
2026-09-02 15:03 ` [net] vxlan: vnifilter: validate the VNI range in vni_filter_entry_policy netdev-bot+sashiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260829030041.940594-1-alishmery18@gmail.com \
    --to=alishmery18@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox