From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
syzbot+3d99fb01bcd740f2fc1e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] igmp: convert struct ip_sf_list to RCU
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 12:52:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830095246.GA2771259@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260827160656.903003-1-edumazet@google.com>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 04:06:56PM +0000, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Commit 23d2b94043ca ("igmp: Add ip_mc_list lock in ip_check_mc_rcu")
> added spin_lock_bh(&im->lock) to ip_check_mc_rcu() to prevent a
> use-after-free while iterating im->sources during concurrent deletions.
>
> However, ip_check_mc_rcu() is called from RCU read-side critical
> sections in packet receive and route lookup fast paths (e.g.
> __mkroute_output(), ip_route_input_rcu(), and __udp4_lib_rcv()).
>
> When igmpv3_send_cr() or igmpv3_send_report() holds &pmc->lock and
> calls add_grec() -> igmpv3_newpack() -> ip_route_output_ports(),
> an XFRM policy matching a multicast destination triggers
> xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one() -> xfrm4_get_saddr() -> __mkroute_output() ->
> ip_check_mc_rcu(). This attempts to acquire &im->lock while &pmc->lock
> is already held on the same CPU, triggering a lockdep recursive locking
> warning / deadlock.
>
> Fix this by converting IPv4 struct ip_sf_list to RCU, mirroring the
> IPv6 implementation in net/ipv6/mcast.c:
>
> 1. Add struct rcu_head to struct ip_sf_list and annotate sf_next,
> sources, and tomb as __rcu pointers.
> 2. Use rcu_assign_pointer() and kfree_rcu() for list updates and
> deletions.
> 3. Remove spin_lock_bh(&im->lock) from ip_check_mc_rcu() and traverse
> im->sources locklessly with for_each_psf_rcu(), reading and writing
> counter fields with READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE().
>
> Note: RCU conversion of /proc/net/mcfilter will be done in a
> separate patch.
>
> Fixes: 23d2b94043ca ("igmp: Add ip_mc_list lock in ip_check_mc_rcu")
> Reported-by: syzbot+3d99fb01bcd740f2fc1e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3d99fb01bcd740f2fc1e
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
[...]
> @@ -1228,11 +1254,12 @@ static void igmpv3_add_delrec(struct in_device *in_dev, struct ip_mc_list *im,
> if (pmc->sfmode == MCAST_INCLUDE) {
> struct ip_sf_list *psf;
>
> + for_each_psf_mclock(im, psf)
> + psf->sf_crcount = pmc->crcount;
> pmc->tomb = im->tomb;
> pmc->sources = im->sources;
In case you need another version:
RCU_INIT_POINTER(pmc->tomb, pmc_dereference(im->tomb, im));
RCU_INIT_POINTER(pmc->sources,
pmc_dereference(im->sources, im));
> - im->tomb = im->sources = NULL;
> - for (psf = pmc->sources; psf; psf = psf->sf_next)
> - psf->sf_crcount = pmc->crcount;
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(im->tomb, NULL);
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(im->sources, NULL);
> }
> spin_unlock_bh(&im->lock);
[...]
> @@ -2011,19 +2047,28 @@ static int ip_mc_del1_src(struct ip_mc_list *pmc, int sfmode,
>
> /* no more filters for this source */
> if (psf_prev)
> - psf_prev->sf_next = psf->sf_next;
> + rcu_assign_pointer(psf_prev->sf_next,
> + pmc_dereference(psf->sf_next, pmc));
> else
> - pmc->sources = psf->sf_next;
> + rcu_assign_pointer(pmc->sources,
> + pmc_dereference(psf->sf_next, pmc));
> #ifdef CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST
> if (psf->sf_oldin &&
> !IGMP_V1_SEEN(in_dev) && !IGMP_V2_SEEN(in_dev)) {
> - psf->sf_crcount = in_dev->mr_qrv ?: READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_igmp_qrv);
> - psf->sf_next = pmc->tomb;
> - pmc->tomb = psf;
> - rv = 1;
> - } else
> + struct ip_sf_list *dpsf = kmalloc_obj(*dpsf, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +
> + if (dpsf) {
> + *dpsf = *psf;
> + dpsf->sf_crcount = in_dev->mr_qrv ?:
> + READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_igmp_qrv);
> + rcu_assign_pointer(dpsf->sf_next,
> + pmc_dereference(pmc->tomb, pmc));
> + rcu_assign_pointer(pmc->tomb, dpsf);
> + rv = 1;
> + }
> + }
> #endif
> - kfree(psf);
> + kfree_rcu(psf, rcu);
> }
> return rv;
> }
The allocation can fail, but I don't see a better fix. I assume it's
done in that way for the reason mentioned in [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260828084531.1826790-2-edumazet@google.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-27 16:06 [PATCH v2 net] igmp: convert struct ip_sf_list to RCU Eric Dumazet
2026-08-30 9:52 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2026-09-01 1:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260830095246.GA2771259@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+3d99fb01bcd740f2fc1e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox