From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 2/5] ipv6: mcast: use copy-on-write RCU updates in ip6_mc_source()
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 18:44:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830154434.GB2974032@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260828084531.1826790-3-edumazet@google.com>
On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 08:45:28AM +0000, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> pmc->sflist is read locklessly under rcu_read_lock() by
> inet6_mc_check() during packet reception in the UDP and RAW
> multicast receive paths.
>
> ip6_mc_source() mutated psl->sl_addr and psl->sl_count in-place
> when adding or removing a source filter. Additionally, when expanding
> the filter buffer, newpsl was published via rcu_assign_pointer()
> before writing the new source into the array.
>
> Because 16-byte struct in6_addr writes are not atomic and array
> shifting is not synchronized with RCU readers, concurrent readers in
> inet6_mc_check() could read torn IPv6 addresses or observe
> duplicated/missed source entries.
>
> Fix this by switching ip6_mc_source() to copy-on-write RCU updates:
> allocate and fully populate newpsl before publishing it via
> rcu_assign_pointer(), and reclaim the old filter via kfree_rcu(),
> matching ip6_mc_msfilter().
>
> Also remove the now unused IP6_SFBLOCK macro.
>
> Fixes: 882ba1f73c06 ("mld: convert ipv6_mc_socklist->sflist to RCU")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
[...]
> @@ -424,58 +422,74 @@ int ip6_mc_source(int add, int omode, struct sock *sk,
> goto done;
> }
>
> + atomic_sub(struct_size(psl, sl_addr, psl->sl_max),
> + &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
> +
> + if (psl->sl_count == 1) {
> + newpsl = NULL;
> + } else {
> + newpsl = sock_kmalloc(sk, struct_size(newpsl, sl_addr,
> + psl->sl_count - 1),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!newpsl) {
> + atomic_add(struct_size(psl, sl_addr, psl->sl_max),
> + &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
> + err = -ENOBUFS;
> + goto done;
> + }
> + newpsl->sl_max = psl->sl_count - 1;
> + newpsl->sl_count = psl->sl_count - 1;
> + for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
> + newpsl->sl_addr[j] = psl->sl_addr[j];
> + for (j = i + 1; j < psl->sl_count; j++)
> + newpsl->sl_addr[j - 1] = psl->sl_addr[j];
> + }
> +
> /* update the interface filter */
> ip6_mc_del_src(idev, group, omode, 1, source, 1);
>
> - for (j = i+1; j < psl->sl_count; j++)
> - psl->sl_addr[j-1] = psl->sl_addr[j];
> - psl->sl_count--;
> + rcu_assign_pointer(pmc->sflist, newpsl);
> + kfree_rcu(psl, rcu);
Earlier we have:
/* if a source filter was set, must be the same mode as before */
if (rcu_access_pointer(pmc->sflist)) {
if (pmc->sfmode != omode) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto done;
}
} else if (pmc->sfmode != omode) {
/* allow mode switches for empty-set filters */
ip6_mc_add_src(idev, group, omode, 0, NULL, 0);
ip6_mc_del_src(idev, group, pmc->sfmode, 0, NULL, 0);
pmc->sfmode = omode;
}
So setting the source list to NULL when deleting the last source in
exclude mode looks like a behavior change, but in a good way.
IPV6_ADD_MEMBERSHIP(G) sfmode = MCAST_EXCLUDE
MCAST_BLOCK_SOURCE(G, S) sflist = { S }
MCAST_UNBLOCK_SOURCE(G, S) was { }, now NULL
MCAST_JOIN_SOURCE_GROUP(G, S2) was -EINVAL, now OK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 8:45 [PATCH v2 net 0/5] ipv6: mcast: RCU and timer fixes Eric Dumazet
2026-08-28 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 net 1/5] ipv6: mcast: fix RCU list diversion in ip6_mc_del1_src() Eric Dumazet
2026-08-30 15:44 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-08-28 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 net 2/5] ipv6: mcast: use copy-on-write RCU updates in ip6_mc_source() Eric Dumazet
2026-08-30 15:44 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2026-08-28 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 net 3/5] ipv6: mcast: fix delay calculation in igmp6_join_group() Eric Dumazet
2026-08-30 15:44 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-08-28 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 net 4/5] ipv6: mcast: use rcu_assign_pointer() for __rcu list updates Eric Dumazet
2026-08-30 15:45 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-08-28 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 net 5/5] ipv6: mcast: use jiffies_delta_to_clock_t() in igmp6_mc_seq_show() Eric Dumazet
2026-08-30 15:45 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-09-01 1:10 ` [PATCH v2 net 0/5] ipv6: mcast: RCU and timer fixes patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260830154434.GB2974032@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox