From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Cc: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Ihor Solodrai" <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf: selftests: Check for flag presence in bpf_program__flags()
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 15:26:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831132648.65843-2-toke@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831132648.65843-1-toke@redhat.com>
Add a check that the BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS and BPF_F_SLEEPABLE flags show
up in bpf_program__flags() when opening a BPF program with the flag
definitions in their section definitions.
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kernel_flag.c | 3 +++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_frags.c | 3 +++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_devmap_attach.c | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kernel_flag.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kernel_flag.c
index 97b00c7efe94..25eb59f460ab 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kernel_flag.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kernel_flag.c
@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ void test_kernel_flag(void)
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(lsm_skel, "lsm_skel"))
return;
+ ASSERT_EQ(bpf_program__flags(lsm_skel->progs.bpf) & BPF_F_SLEEPABLE,
+ BPF_F_SLEEPABLE, "sleepable in program flags");
+
lsm_skel->bss->monitored_tid = sys_gettid();
ret = test_kernel_flag__attach(lsm_skel);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_frags.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_frags.c
index fce203640f8c..a894b1ab46f4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_frags.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_frags.c
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ static void test_xdp_update_frags(void)
return;
prog = bpf_object__next_program(obj, NULL);
+ ASSERT_EQ(bpf_program__flags(prog) & BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS,
+ BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS, "frags in program flags");
+
if (bpf_object__load(obj))
return;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_devmap_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_devmap_attach.c
index a8ab05216c38..dff6b3e7266e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_devmap_attach.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_devmap_attach.c
@@ -146,6 +146,11 @@ static void test_xdp_with_devmap_frags_helpers(void)
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_xdp_with_devmap_helpers__open_and_load"))
return;
+ ASSERT_EQ(bpf_program__flags(skel->progs.xdp_dummy_dm_frags) & BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS,
+ BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS, "frags in program flags");
+ ASSERT_EQ(bpf_program__flags(skel->progs.xdp_dummy_dm) & BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS,
+ 0, "frags not in program flags");
+
dm_fd_frags = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.xdp_dummy_dm_frags);
map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.dm_ports);
err = bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(dm_fd_frags, &info, &len);
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 13:26 [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] libbpf: Move section-defined program flags to prog_flags Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2026-08-31 13:26 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2026-08-31 14:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf: selftests: Check for flag presence in bpf_program__flags() bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-01 8:03 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2026-08-31 13:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] selftests/bpf: Set BPF program flags non-destructively Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2026-08-31 14:18 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-01 8:11 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2026-08-31 14:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] libbpf: Move section-defined program flags to prog_flags bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-01 8:30 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831132648.65843-2-toke@redhat.com \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox