From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, idosch@nvidia.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
linus.luessing@c0d3.blue, bridge@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: bridge: mcast: fix br_multicast_list_adjacent rcu walk of mglist
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:00:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831180045.4491fd1e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260828100642.2664347-1-razor@blackwall.org>
On Fri, 28 Aug 2026 13:06:42 +0300 Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> Sashiko reported a bug [1] that br_multicast_del_port_group unlists the
> port group not using proper rcu helper that preserves the next pointer and
> after that immediately frees the port group without waiting for rcu grace
> period. The only rcu walker of mglist is br_multicast_list_adjacent() and
> it turns out that function has always been buggy because mglist was never
> converted to RCU. Fix it by acquiring the bridge's multicast lock for the
> mglist walk. We can do a proper mglist rcu conversion later.
>
> [1] https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260826014200.362304-1-littleddfu%40gmail.com
>
> Fixes: 07f8ac4a1e26 ("bridge: add export of multicast database adjacent to net_dev")
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
> ---
> We can do a proper mglist rcu conversion when net-next opens up.
>
> net/bridge/br_multicast.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> index 3ef5d8bbf552..7fa5f4444c4c 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> @@ -4967,15 +4967,19 @@ int br_multicast_list_adjacent(struct net_device *dev,
> if (!port->dev || port->dev == dev)
> continue;
>
> - hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(group, &port->mglist, mglist) {
> + spin_lock_bh(&br->multicast_lock);
> + hlist_for_each_entry(group, &port->mglist, mglist) {
> entry = kmalloc_obj(*entry, GFP_ATOMIC);
> - if (!entry)
> + if (!entry) {
> + spin_unlock_bh(&br->multicast_lock);
Clashiko says that the only caller wants to see a ENOMEM which we never
produce, let's throw it in while we're touching this?
https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260828100642.2664347-1-razor@blackwall.org
> goto unlock;
> + }
>
> entry->addr = group->key.addr;
> list_add(&entry->list, br_ip_list);
> count++;
> }
> + spin_unlock_bh(&br->multicast_lock);
> }
>
> unlock:
--
pw-bot: cr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 10:06 [PATCH net] net: bridge: mcast: fix br_multicast_list_adjacent rcu walk of mglist Nikolay Aleksandrov
2026-08-30 7:03 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-09-01 1:00 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831180045.4491fd1e@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linus.luessing@c0d3.blue \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox