From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Zhiling Zou <zhilinz@nebusec.ai>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
vega@nebusec.ai
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 1/1] ipv6: flowlabel: cap duplicate leases per socket
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 11:16:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903081617.GA11345@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83f8535972ff6e3741548476a1d50dec24c758be.1788415194.git.zhilinz@nebusec.ai>
On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 02:23:03PM +0800, Zhiling Zou wrote:
> ipv6_flowlabel_get() allocates an ipv6_fl_socklist entry for every
> successful GET. The recheck path for a compatible existing flowlabel
> links another lease without applying any lease admission check. Repeated
> GET requests for one shareable label can therefore grow a socket's lease
> list without bound.
>
> Reject a new unprivileged lease once the socket already holds
> FL_MAX_PER_SOCK leases. Check this on the shared recheck path so reuse
> of a globally interned label, including the fl_intern() collision path,
> is covered as well. New-label admission remains under the existing
> mem_check() policy.
>
> Use capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN) rather than ns_capable(), matching
> mem_check(). An unprivileged user must not bypass the cap by creating a
> user namespace and a netns where they have CAP_NET_ADMIN, which would
> still consume host memory.
>
> Check the capability only when the socket reaches the limit, so
> successful unprivileged GET requests below the cap do not generate a
> capability audit. Do the admission check before updating linger and
> expires so a rejected GET does not refresh the shared label, matching
> the existing socket-list allocation failure path.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Vega <vega@nebusec.ai>
> Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhiling Zou <zhilinz@nebusec.ai>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 6:23 [PATCH net v4 0/1] ipv6: flowlabel: cap duplicate leases per socket Zhiling Zou
2026-09-03 6:23 ` [PATCH net v4 1/1] " Zhiling Zou
2026-09-03 7:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-09-03 8:16 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260903081617.GA11345@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vega@nebusec.ai \
--cc=zhilinz@nebusec.ai \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox