From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rxrpc: Take write lock when publishing the initial RxGK key
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 10:07:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903090735.GJ396647@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824150220.216067-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 11:02:20PM +0800, Chengfeng Ye wrote:
> rxgk_rekey() updates the transport-key ring under security_use_lock,
> and rxgk_get_key() takes a reference under the corresponding read
> lock. The initial publication in rxgk_init_connection_security()
> writes conn->rxgk.enctype and conn->rxgk.keys[] without the write
> lock.
>
> On a client connection, a second sendmsg can observe
> RXRPC_CONN_CLIENT through a lockless load of conn->state, skip
> rxrpc_init_client_conn_security(), and call rxgk_get_key() without
> ever acquiring security_lock. Because the initializer never took
> the write lock, the reader's read lock provides neither exclusion
> nor a matching acquire-release pair.
>
> Concurrent RxGK key consumers were observed in a two-sender
> workload. KCSAN reported:
>
> BUG: KCSAN: data-race in rxgk_get_key / rxgk_secure_packet
>
> write to 0xffff8aef4023c318 of 8 bytes by task 1968 on cpu 0:
> rxgk_secure_packet+0x46c/0x820
> rxrpc_send_data+0x562/0x1a20
> rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0x976/0xa80
> rxrpc_sendmsg+0x20f/0x2a0
>
> read to 0xffff8aef4023c318 of 8 bytes by task 1969 on cpu 1:
> rxgk_get_key+0x209/0x5e0
> rxgk_alloc_txbuf+0xa4/0x2a0
> rxrpc_send_data+0x8e2/0x1a20
> rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0x976/0xa80
> rxrpc_sendmsg+0x20f/0x2a0
>
> value changed: 0x7fffffffffffffff -> 0x7fffffffffffffee
>
> That report is on the key context's byte counter rather than the
> initial publication, but it shows that lookup and secured transmit
> already overlap on the same connection.
>
> Take security_use_lock for writing while publishing the initial
> enctype and transport key, matching the locking used when rekeying.
>
I think a Fixes tag is needed here, citing the patch where
this problem first manifested.
You can simply post it in response to this email.
But if you do re-post for some other reason note that
there should not be a blank line between the Fixes and
Signed-off-by tags (or between any other tags).
> Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 15:02 [PATCH net] rxrpc: Take write lock when publishing the initial RxGK key Chengfeng Ye
2026-09-03 9:07 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-09-03 15:04 ` Chengfeng Ye
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260903090735.GJ396647@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicoyip.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox