From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 672E53328E6; Thu, 3 Sep 2026 23:22:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788477754; cv=none; b=iJbBFRClXZ5SwvLf6I4OcdyxARplMulbhXkM5hOVsjHv+FDStmvhZyF6l2SDE+arjsaStF9jskQf1C77IVKGyyj4kNDZalhd+7ij/pyFLRDV8YmDG0xmt2gzCnNY3692cw3CtAtQLlnflQJ68k/LWtPcDKa5qnDEs11fWC5WIvU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788477754; c=relaxed/simple; bh=U5x9qaygFInR0b+wz8KfAjhmfGyc0PwTUIUcxduux9U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=alCifv2Vx2+UuUHdgmJMUc96tNlCAb3+rfOkk61oXVbz/Q2uXRQvyNB1icEPepwCaMcAWWtcpbwxf3BduDXV4HWlNRfRQUR9MSJYIpLu2nlWUq8yNe3vwxJYASj/1hmJ7LdOP6tnU9nJMVPsi/sscU3C4N22uONs1sPgl91j2dE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=aQoo80y8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="aQoo80y8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87E0C1F000E9; Thu, 3 Sep 2026 23:22:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788477753; bh=FvNG3LS8nPKzshGEM3d/JxEgqTvJYa+h83LktEUOD94=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=aQoo80y82vc9TxxsFDQBriTEWIeLzd/Ryt+8HOXF4c5N0mBRuno3eHgTx7IoemawA noVHuzBJi6Bx2nfUWaG14UcVKFQaq9y/eqe/rjd34FoFw2MMOrJvo8BSsm1j7q0hLs 9CA2dLz+dLTpLDPDf+eYvE0Xl1ZQYdCUmXuYU6iYLHeEoEm1U5QsTM5PhOski2p69k DWBBHb4s9NYB2QPKJAI4z2HxxhpNBnyMIZFuuzSC+Jhpr8hmh0adNtFaUz0s/XdbE8 awv5N3RGCVdrrWW8iiQXLkKPXmmDxAviGBZERYD1BQ8mkwiesyst23I3rX8Qtl6gNQ 03sRNauHVabfQ== Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 16:22:32 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Wei Fang (OSS)" Cc: Claudiu Manoil , Vladimir Oltean , Clark Wang , "andrew@lunn.ch" , "olteanv@gmail.com" , "andrew+netdev@lunn.ch" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "edumazet@google.com" , "pabeni@redhat.com" , "linux@armlinux.org.uk" , Wei Fang , "imx@lists.linux.dev" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 00/15] net: enetc: SR-IOV improvements and ENETC v4 VF support Message-ID: <20260903162232.791e4c43@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260831025441.635045-1-wei.fang@oss.nxp.com> <20260902195613.1e18b44c@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 3 Sep 2026 03:24:24 +0000 Wei Fang (OSS) wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:54:26 +0800 wei.fang@oss.nxp.com wrote: > > > This series enhances SR-IOV support for ENETC v1 and adds VF support > > > for ENETC v4. For ENETC v1, the trusted VF management and per-VF > > > configuration query via ndo_get_vf_config() are added. For ENETC v4, > > > preliminary VF support is introduced for i.MX94 and i.MX95 platforms. > > > > You only replied to some of the AI feedback, should we assume that > > feedback on patches 12/13/14 is legit and expect v4? > > I have not seen any other feedback on patches 12/13/14. Except for a > pre-existing issue on patch 14, but I do not think the issue needs to be > addressed. > > Sashiko review link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831025441.635045-1-wei.fang%40oss.nxp.com Please TAL at: https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260831025441.635045-7-wei.fang@oss.nxp.com