Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Chao <liuc63@xiaopeng.com>
To: Robin van der Gracht <robin@protonic.nl>,
	Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@kernel.org>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] can: j1939: check received packet count before completing session
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 02:05:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909180554.365350-1-liuc63@xiaopeng.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908145715.D70BD1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org>

Addressed in v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260909173105.158202-1-liuc63@xiaopeng.com/

> Does this inadvertently suppress the diagnostic warning for EOMA size
> mismatches on transmitter sessions?

Yes.  v2 emits the warning for both rx and tx and gates only the abort on
!session->transmission.

> Could this error path cause a permanent leak of the session structure
> and permanently block the SA/DA address pair?

v2 returns early for sessions already in J1939_SESSION_WAITING_ABORT, so
the deactivation timer armed by the earlier abort keeps running.  Same
failure mode as 1809c82aa073 ("net: can: j1939:
j1939_xtp_rx_rts_session_active(): deactivate session upon receiving the
second rts").  j1939_session_cancel() is fragile here in general -- the
cts_one and dat_one cancel paths are still unguarded -- but that is a
separate patch.

> This is a pre-existing issue, but looking at j1939_session_cancel()
> exposed by this path, could it trigger an AB-BA deadlock?

Pre-existing, and this series adds no new locking: j1939_xtp_rx_eoma_one()
calls j1939_session_cancel() from the same RX softirq context as the
existing cts_one and dat_one cancel paths, so the reachability of the
cycle is unchanged.  Fixing it means restructuring how
j1939_session_cancel() cancels the rxtimer under active_session_list_lock;
that is a separate change.

       reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260908145715.D70BD1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-09-09 18:05 ` Liu Chao [this message]
2026-09-07 14:56 [PATCH 0/2] can: j1939: tighten TP receive-path checks Liu Chao
2026-09-07 14:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] can: j1939: check received packet count before completing session Liu Chao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260909180554.365350-1-liuc63@xiaopeng.com \
    --to=liuc63@xiaopeng.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robin@protonic.nl \
    --cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox