From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E98649E5F4; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 15:50:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789141859; cv=none; b=PzNxJ9VxI0yY3didXh96FF8ixxD4pAdKrn+bHgtOr0ClmOnilBm8jTfHZucGj2Tf+qPS8S6Pcscoo92kgUHGXulBCTtIO2P2GUWzE3ldyEhdLcVRM+PY9FM5JOPMfWv3qS5CLdZntXOb+6l4fzMf3NPjeq3ZzwHXfo+Au0sYznI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789141859; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8eJpAwvsYiQ3lxwz7Gq50yCGzdzF++CZt+dIjUAsovg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=p1cAX4CbMRjZX0kyrJwo6ocG0WMdWd6V8nRlGKPMd/v+KJEvqFAO0iOOR+T96soUkfONs3XnyMj1tpV5dmdXzJCP6gOGuT1OkuX6xt0ibp/8NioDcmdjDtN5TCKkLYRnP/VkCGqpm8MyYMQ0/CTqQaSagE1nOEiE6W/yUL0qLNY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UhFnQR98; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UhFnQR98" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 542EC1F000FF; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 15:50:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789141857; bh=9feugFNVEQD71QBQu25PDlZDuMKbLoHRAi3hgn3EbbY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=UhFnQR98fjHhsZShlx/REhzY8SzPxoQOisT1qr66AVRIvZJQBEtcHMYkXgqcnqz2B K8b+fbOnl7rBLsCMYzOR65OvsXkCCurOG4TPh5LifgKmvPRnyA50YEc98cVIJDB6Q4 swokjB4fN+k0qmZubnhTb9/AyYGokduqAmw23FvpRXfI/1tUUE72lBYdQ2Y/idSakM 9w+y2LiOeflFw9c5T1FlUVAR1xfecXxQ0gJjfd9p/lUno4prxgxpjvP8mC8VJX5DR2 nckbyZKV2vTAsPJfTxWAhDkVspnMq7pIpBsjVF/fZjVryUDOp6r6JAmtDWqr+OFYG5 Q0BIATU9xHdiA== Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 08:50:56 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Yuyang Huang Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , David Ahern , Donald Hunter , Eric Dumazet , Ido Schimmel , Jacob Keller , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Nicolas Dichtel , Nikolaos Gkarlis , Paolo Abeni , Sabrina Dubroca , Shuah Khan , Simon Horman , Stanislav Fomichev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/4] rtnetlink: dump link-layer multicast addresses Message-ID: <20260911085056.10dbc3e0@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260911105103.7771-1-sigefriedhyy@gmail.com> References: <20260911105103.7771-1-sigefriedhyy@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 11 Sep 2026 19:50:59 +0900 Yuyang Huang wrote: > Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 0/4] rtnetlink: dump link-layer multicast addresses The new test seems to be failing: # 0.14 [+0.05] # Check| At /srv/vmksft/testing/wt-1/tools/testing/selftests/net/./rtnetlink.py, line 171, in dump_mcaddr_l2_check: # 0.15 [+0.01] # Check| ksft_eq({(addr['ifa-index'], addr['target-netnsid']) # 0.15 [+0.00] # Check failed {(9, 5), (8, 5), (11, 5)} != {(11, 5)} target-netnsid did not dump the peer netns # 0.17 [+0.01] not ok 3 rtnetlink.dump_mcaddr_l2_check Please wait a couple of days with the repost.