From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Abdifatah Suruur <suruurism@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
subash.a.kasiviswanathan@qualcomm.com,
sean.tranchetti@qualcomm.com, dnlplm@gmail.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v7] net: qualcomm: rmnet: require CAP_NET_ADMIN in the real device netns for config ops
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:49:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911104906.GC48209@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910082643.14437-1-suruurism@gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 11:26:42AM +0300, Abdifatah Suruur wrote:
> An rmnet device may be created with its real device in a different
> netns than the rmnet device itself (rmnet_newlink() resolves it in
> link_net), and the config paths below only check CAP_NET_ADMIN against
> dev_net(dev), while mutating rmnet port state attached to the real
> device:
>
> - rmnet_changelink() rewrites the endpoint mux table and
> port->data_format and, via rmnet_vnd_update_dev_mtu(), can shrink the
> MTU of the rmnet endpoint netdevs.
> - rmnet_add_bridge() and rmnet_del_bridge(), reachable via
> ndo_add_slave/ndo_del_slave through RTM_SETLINK IFLA_MASTER, flip
> port->rmnet_mode and port->bridge_ep on the real device's port; with
> bridge_ep pointing at a caller-owned device, rmnet_rx_handler() then
> forwards real-device ingress frames to it.
> - rmnet_set_coalesce() rewrites the port aggregation parameters via
> ETHTOOL_SCOALESCE (ioctl) or ETHTOOL_MSG_COALESCE_SET (netlink),
> whose capability checks likewise only cover dev's netns.
>
> A caller privileged only in the rmnet device's netns can therefore
> rewrite the shared cellular data-path state owned by another netns, and
> steer its ingress traffic.
>
> Gate the rtnl paths with rtnl_dev_link_net_capable(), matching the
> "require CAP_NET_ADMIN in the device netns for changelink" series
> (vxlan/geneve, CVE-2026-68432), and gate the ethtool setter with
> ns_capable() in the real device netns, mirroring the check dev_ethtool()
> already applies to dev's netns. Report the new rejections through
> extack where one is available.
>
> The gates cover the configuration paths only. Teardown (RTM_DELLINK
> reaching rmnet_dellink(), and rmnet_config_notify_cb() unregistering
> the bridge when the slave device is deleted) is intentionally left
> ungated: link deletion is normal netdev lifecycle behaviour, and the
> changelink series this matches (vxlan/geneve, CVE-2026-68432) gated
> only the configuration paths.
>
> Fixes: 2abb5792387e ("net: qualcomm: rmnet: Allow configuration updates to existing devices")
> Fixes: 60d58f971c1077 ("net: qualcomm: rmnet: Implement bridge mode")
> Fixes: db8a563a9d9024 ("net: qualcomm: rmnet: add ethtool support for configuring tx aggregation")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Abdifatah Suruur <suruurism@gmail.com>
> ---
> v7:
> - state explicitly in the commit message that the dellink and notifier
> teardown paths are out of scope, per the Sashiko review
> - drop the master-moved-into-the-real-device-netns rationale from the
> rmnet_add_bridge() comment: on the add path do_set_master() resolves
> the master in the slave's netns, so the rationale only applies to
> rmnet_del_bridge(), where the master comes from
> netdev_master_upper_dev_get()
> - use the netdev comment style in rmnet_set_coalesce(), per the
> Sashiko review
> v6:
> - gate rmnet_add_bridge() and rmnet_del_bridge() on slave_dev, the
> RTM_SETLINK target the caller was actually authorized against,
> instead of rmnet_dev: a master moved into the real device's netns
> short-circuits rtnl_dev_link_net_capable() through the net_eq()
> check, so a caller only privileged in the slave's netns could
> otherwise attach or clear the bridge state of the real device's
> port
> - add the Fixes tag for the commit that introduced rmnet_set_coalesce()
> v5:
> - also gate rmnet_set_coalesce(), the ethtool setter that rewrites the
> port aggregation parameters of the real device's port, per the
> Sashiko review
> - report the new capability rejections through extack where available
> v4:
> - use the netdev comment style, per Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
> v3:
> - cover rmnet_add_bridge() and rmnet_del_bridge() with the same gate;
> they mutate the same real-device port state via ndo_add_slave/
> ndo_del_slave and have no capability check of their own
> - correct the impact wording: rmnet_vnd_update_dev_mtu() only reads
> real_dev->mtu; the MTU store lands on the rmnet endpoint netdevs via
> rmnet_vnd_change_mtu(), not on the real device
> v2:
> - drop Reported-by: (implied for the author), per Jakub Kicinski
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 8:26 [PATCH net v7] net: qualcomm: rmnet: require CAP_NET_ADMIN in the real device netns for config ops Abdifatah Suruur
2026-09-11 10:49 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911104906.GC48209@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dnlplm@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.tranchetti@qualcomm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=subash.a.kasiviswanathan@qualcomm.com \
--cc=suruurism@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox