From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE466511E7E for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 16:14:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789748097; cv=none; b=LWtWBUw8QRrWQeQizbiel+TDjhAD2+95tSPYedZDreCOfLJS/j23MsAH6dUFn4bSRjw7uJH7LwW3fjsmmvb9nxV6Ng0bMWkQlWvFOZDujsgKVWufqELxSMBTb/WzZPol+0vjWcDWclGOWPjDgwyQNwTIKkkUJnoraNN+G5Rvs3E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789748097; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bFp+EXRjbodHLK7YXfpdqCEEkZtwzgjrFXgpcFW3BuA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AMZxRz0PflD1lySJmjGFHgAoFmqpgK5Z9gGTJDZZiIlWiT5XCXqp/7diINH5Hu2hCbfhDiBYSjIYRt7hj5B7lDNthSIy1tR6MkcuiemGaSE4T2gj3pEcfpOVudZultEmggxQskRuk+k8Lz67FQN8aR9PMy6U4+dl/EMkZvT9tAo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=AuA1r+Xg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AuA1r+Xg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A350C1F000FF; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 16:14:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789748095; bh=nuDJmR7ZuiY8ldekJiLAdEyyeGn5S8iUUxFuWoF7QKE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=AuA1r+XgprVK9aLY1Kg+m9Hrum+Z+J1nD7OV26cHpP29469DfzJgKn7TqY+lj1+iS mW9G6TbmSkjbjRRU0fdcZD5/qvaqqRCqNjcy+Q4h2QCqgbQRLpScWbzc7F63Erai1R D//FeBlMA306ZZbvrImbh5RqvfEmw3PftHrvHXfkbQs0jKjmL5MnyJC0Aex0RhJu7+ C1MPNKmSDo4/uwHv4IWOthSKYTo0TBlRaAzMmMKsBfn/PtVIMgTSYelJy62gLgwdAI HyMcXoLikvqLBiT49qQMjMDcYHMoFqs9fTxLC1UfhpnNylZFgDf7fDuQbMGE8Mk0/z LfPQGK80jGeOQ== Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 17:14:51 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Alexander Duyck Cc: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [net PATCH v2 3/6] eth: fbnic: use the Rx queue napi pointer to find the napi vector Message-ID: <20260918161451.GS51261@horms.kernel.org> References: <178942021136.7700.4391219358260544104.stgit@ahduyck-xeon-server.home.arpa> <178967952944.22033.10329187569173798096@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 08:11:04AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 2:12 PM wrote: > > > > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential > > issue(s) to consider: ... > I agree that this is a pre-existing bug, but I wouldn't fix it in this > patch. I would probably introduce yet another patch to resolve it. > > By my count we have 3 pre-existing issues that aren't directly related > to the original problem. If possible I would prefer to address them > separately, otherwise I can tack on 3 additional diffs to the set and > resubmit. Yes, I agree that is a good approach. I think that in the age of AI-generated reviews finding related bugs it is best to adhere to a strict scope for a patch(set) combined with follow-up fixes. Else a patchset may drown in scope creep. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman ...