From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pz2-f41.google.com (mail-pz2-f41.google.com [74.125.228.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8DB44C9E06 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 17:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.228.41 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790012374; cv=none; b=W8C36FkRBlcB6r1s9q2cfUVoBAkq8VKLQVMo2LvLvjPmvKpCckpJszXrLsEnmfVex8tjRp3PhksIFyE/ok53xdQTNaLSEhei0T1h7DPiyx4dQXthR/ZqaB5NfCniW4pUK4ICzkx44Bo/qsDLBnjbkGLYmGyxucksnkYo3dPKzeM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790012374; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HhFClUICP7LmPKOCpv+tBSAjahEijfSps+4cVHoIynM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=UitTD3T9rXFV9pZ+ltlIHDLcSFdW+DkPANZEdEp5v/oSM77zYLFajnJji1Sx+2MGtOvN8fI1PYLnL5pEAATILgw63/T1Hcs+1FW6a2qu163Ag32ot25Ip77r5hta7XS+736MxRLUivQGmcF/NxCMG02iNE1WE9NXNnN2CkvLxAY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=X3a2Ts0G; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.228.41 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="X3a2Ts0G" Received: by mail-pz2-f41.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-8686f46e4adso2782483b3a.0 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:39:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1790012371; x=1790617171; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=jINDts3UuKVPqaZDvWUfm35N/OrGGobyZ1ICHQzvtsU=; b=X3a2Ts0Gi+7GKV1OXyIntTqUVYfXrGSdqu84S5KrQLDGJeStjfvQkEiRxK+zNVAF0g DkK6mlCcuKPPMAYKGeOtwxE91PBUe7uzQjRCe7TgW5uUA2ryKZcUJHmsJCK8ONM5Idiz KdXAOOK+5xWy8NAq9WsHvgMkc2byBuFoyAFHvG/Jds8V9PLiHxuCaXzR/SaCl0kdA0IL IdbMmZYUEiCvsHrCQ/ZxuNrK3oXg1XEtjzSrz3uQsYvI4rL8yHmSCkqs6czvInxksdUF 4Y/8gNnbX5k/vFJRSufQqbNJCZBPn5/HmWxm2lUdArJwPSgVYEbzHO0hC9D6tdWxmr+u WlDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1790012371; x=1790617171; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=jINDts3UuKVPqaZDvWUfm35N/OrGGobyZ1ICHQzvtsU=; b=Ie26rQbWwSDqYhEQASmrQ7LOg/fyCEeGfsy5LTUov+EflR4YNPUKkT1YvtlDD8H6XP 0SPRQ8AG3EsnN+C8FE1B7mqAV0Un4MGj3/cKJtLnc9XvJsghxL39Wlo0E+1w9sipnop8 k+jfvjP0iI4ZayFnnSHAiESBl79BedTPG3xdgQVMrq8nwb331zF1CRSMk8K1hUhpkStK Ui1KIfeYia19EndTrhv1lrcGj3b34qFoBMP3asZyOISNZ8H2xMYomtMhi5ipTP7CH2kS LNQD7v0e+V9UGBB6aDlEwRKhWYh/zrEKq8lebIDPeXP/ybD/SmoeQmLG1KG83qM9TmG2 l5EQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBxZ9dHZeYBh6NFCcIALXJC0c59qOS+NzqOuK5X7mgDEv9u7Ud5grulof8LNMHsMxevZYN7wKWo=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++lGX5T5AWTXp9BqF79HHKUR1IaM/GKVAT+eHLv+R0kJ2HkUx3ut cfmbWdxcyB4pw/KDNG1QdTBGOkMXg/wD+C8Dol9rfMrZoR1tK98iXSNW X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou0cPKXYdotYm4eTJHIqNj5l0aAFBfzeHoF8ANoISHpQFtTUTaZLnb+zt9SWvPh cVt8dok8l5Jj+dM3UJ732kf+qKw4H7jYKbAHAg0sq28BUt7o6Ao/iZugcF9uJ4ilVGfWCoFekN1 I81HfuTy/cVwuv6vIyCHDgmnIIKlLqSNRWyfie7tzXA1aJ3O5Vfe1icsTHfaquMjpswKKYiIVVw gs6XV3XkzztvvZBlJgfQjvcCCku88XL8Z+nLOK6uy6p0z8FssIi3pdwVte9E8sUWAi0WyogCe8+ mTk4vD/LF2k7tUo86hrMaMkHNJGtojMzEuu0Su27N/t2gciYioDzxlEEid2GVdmyJkf3rOY0KA5 MUcBhQfsfaXeaQPRkksneVfn/4rJO9UHEW4iSHpts1DJ61t1rNlM8T118Rh0dFzbO7jV7rI+yql 7pdvYNrJerYpB/ww10M9pVz7QzOhN5VVw82nemzRlnEzlygSFOlkJnXrJMKI/o2n1vUfN1wJyFm rzB0ZUqwW21CMoGc0c442KcKPpahBKaGgiWG2y4TQ8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:4304:b0:3d0:d1f1:6ec5 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-3dd8c2dd73fmr18840357637.4.1790012370973; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:39:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 192.168.50.3 ([198.176.50.208]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 41be03b00d2f7-cc72af0955esm3986985a12.32.2026.09.21.10.39.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:39:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Weiming Shi To: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Eduard Zingerman , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Jiri Olsa , Emil Tsalapatis , Ihor Solodrai , John Fastabend , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Shuah Khan Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Xiang Mei , Weiming Shi Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] bpf: clear stale IPv4 options after LWT encapsulation Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 01:39:08 +0800 Message-ID: <20260921173910.90847-1-bestswngs@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.55.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit bpf_lwt_push_ip_encap() rebases the network header after prepending an outer IP header, but can leave IPCB(skb)->opt describing the inner IPv4 header. An ingress LWT route can then make an ICMP error consume stale option offsets. Patch 1 marks completed LWT IP encapsulation and clears the stale metadata after bpf_prog_run_save_cb() has restored the protocol control block. For same-family IPv4 encapsulation it clears only IPCB(skb)->opt. For a family change it resets the new family's control block following seg6_do_srh_encap(). Patch 2 adds compact coverage to the existing LWT IP encapsulation selftest. Changes: v4: - Follow Alexei Starovoitov's suggestion to drop the independent freplace patch and keep cb_access as one bit. - Clear only IPv4 options when the family is unchanged; use skb->protocol and the SEG6 precedent when it changes. - Rebase on bpf-next and replace the standalone selftest with compact coverage in the existing LWT IP encapsulation test. v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260920163211.795547-1-bestswngs@gmail.com/ - Follow Daniel Borkmann's suggestion to reset the CB after bpf_prog_run_save_cb() restores it, avoiding an extra CB copy. - Split out freplace handling and selftests, and cover CB access, VRF, nested runs, and already-encapsulated packets. v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260916170406.1280954-2-bestswngs@gmail.com/ - Preserve the protocol CB for programs without ctx->cb[] access and restore the proper layout for the final packet consumer. v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260915170147.3943392-2-bestswngs@gmail.com/ Weiming Shi (2): bpf: clear stale IPv4 options after LWT encapsulation selftests/bpf: cover stale CB after LWT IP encapsulation include/linux/filter.h | 1 + net/core/lwt_bpf.c | 30 ++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lwt_ip_encap.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_lwt_ip_encap.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 123 insertions(+) -- 2.55.0