From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] tcp: remove dead code in tcp_rcv_state_process()
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 01:06:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922010627.2291980-1-edumazet@google.com> (raw)
Since commit 3d501dd326fb ("tcp: do not accept ACK of bytes we never
sent"), tcp_ack() bounds the acceptable old ACK window by
min(tp->max_window, tp->bytes_acked).
When sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_RECV, tp->bytes_acked is always 0, so
any segment with before(ack, prior_snd_una) immediately returns
-SKB_DROP_REASON_TCP_TOO_OLD_ACK and never reaches the old_ack label
(which returns 0).
Therefore, tcp_ack() can only return 0 in closing states (where old
ACKs are accepted), and can never return 0 in TCP_SYN_RECV.
Simplify the tcp_ack() return value check in tcp_rcv_state_process()
to only check for negative return values and remove the unreachable
!reason branch.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 19 +++++++------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 92bc60716f33d81e9ce90d9de2e5d989ba71c8a3..892ff256e235272a8483a11949cc98b319dd7cc9 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -7233,19 +7233,14 @@ tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
FLAG_UPDATE_TS_RECENT |
FLAG_NO_CHALLENGE_ACK);
- if ((int)reason <= 0) {
- if (sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_RECV) {
+ /* accept old ack (reason == 0) during closing */
+ if ((int)reason < 0) {
+ reason = -reason;
+ if (sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_RECV)
/* send one RST */
- if (!reason)
- return SKB_DROP_REASON_TCP_OLD_ACK;
- return -reason;
- }
- /* accept old ack during closing */
- if ((int)reason < 0) {
- tcp_send_challenge_ack(sk, false);
- reason = -reason;
- goto discard;
- }
+ return reason;
+ tcp_send_challenge_ack(sk, false);
+ goto discard;
}
SKB_DR_SET(reason, NOT_SPECIFIED);
switch (sk->sk_state) {
--
2.55.0.1082.g2b9226bbc0-goog
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 1:06 Eric Dumazet [this message]
2026-09-23 1:22 ` [PATCH net-next] tcp: remove dead code in tcp_rcv_state_process() Xuanqiang Luo
2026-09-23 2:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260922010627.2291980-1-edumazet@google.com \
--to=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox