From: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it>
To: Yuya Kusakabe <yuya.kusakabe@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
David Lebrun <david.lebrun@uclouvain.be>,
Ahmed Abdelsalam <amsalam20@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it,
Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] seg6: fix HMAC validation when an extension header precedes the SRHA
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2026 06:17:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260926061738.25343ff4cf4ecd54e7f0750a@uniroma2.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923-b4-seg6-hmac-transport-header-v1-1-3ae85dc0fdb9@gmail.com>
On Wed, 23 Sep 2026 13:51:37 +0900
Yuya Kusakabe <yuya.kusakabe@gmail.com> wrote:
> seg6_hmac_validate_skb() derived the SRH from skb_transport_header().
> That only holds while the two coincide, which is not true on the
> seg6_local input path.
>
> ip6_rcv_core() leaves the transport header just past the IPv6 header.
> A Hop-by-Hop options header is consumed before the route lookup and
> advances it, but a Destination Options header is not: the seg6_local
> lwtunnel is entered through an input redirect from the route lookup,
> which bypasses the extension header handlers. The transport header
> then still points at the Destination Options header while
> seg6_get_srh() has located the real SRH further down the chain.
>
> The HMAC is therefore computed over the Destination Options header,
> and a packet carrying a valid HMAC TLV is dropped when
> seg6_require_hmac is set. Such a packet is legitimate: RFC 8200 allows
> Destination Options before a routing header, and get_srh() has walked
> the header chain since commit 5829d70b0b6c ("ipv6: sr: fix get_srh() to
> comply with IPv6 standard "RFC 8200""). The misread header is covered
> by the pskb_may_pull() in seg6_get_srh(), so the result is a wrong
> verdict, not an out-of-bounds access.
Thanks for the patch.
This patch also closes an out-of-bounds read that the commit message
does not mention. The commit says the misread gives a wrong verdict,
not an out-of-bounds access. That holds for Destination Options, which
has the same length encoding as the SRH. A Fragment or an Authentication
header is encoded differently, and a forged packet can put one before
the SRH. The old code read that header at skb_transport_header() as an
SRH, and seg6_get_tlv_hmac() computed the TLV pointer from its second
byte. The pull in seg6_get_srh() covers only the bytes up to the end of
the real SRH, and the TLV pointer can land past them. This runs before
seg6_require_hmac is read, and the default configuration reaches it.
Before this patch, a forged Fragment before the SRH toward an End SID
faults in that read (KASAN, DEBUG_PAGEALLOC):
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff888106304078
RIP: seg6_hmac_validate_skb (net/ipv6/seg6_hmac.c:91 net/ipv6/seg6_hmac.c:192)
input_action_end_core.isra.0 (net/ipv6/seg6_local.c:225 net/ipv6/seg6_local.c:413)
seg6_local_input_core (net/ipv6/seg6_local.c:1640)
seg6_local_input (net/ipv6/seg6_local.c:1662)
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
Could the commit message also mention the out-of-bounds read?
Ciao,
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-26 4:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 4:51 [PATCH net] seg6: fix HMAC validation when an extension header precedes the SRH Yuya Kusakabe
2026-09-26 4:17 ` Andrea Mayer [this message]
2026-09-27 5:10 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260926061738.25343ff4cf4ecd54e7f0750a@uniroma2.it \
--to=andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it \
--cc=amsalam20@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.lebrun@uclouvain.be \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it \
--cc=yuya.kusakabe@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox